Death Deception, (The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald), Part III.
By S.r. “Dusty” Rohde
© November, 2016
Before I go into this next article, I would like to supply some personal background. A few years ago, I created the Facebook Group “JFK ALTERED AUTOPSY IMAGES”. In that time, I’ve spent personally, hundreds of hours examining the autopsy photos, X-ray’s, testimonies and everything related to the Autopsy. This includes hundreds of dialogues with dozens of people on the various evidence, including eye witness accounts. This is not something that was started a week ago. On that note, anyone interested in purchasing copies of the autopsy images may do so by contacting Walt Brown, prolific and long time JFK researcher in his own right.
After seeing that J.J. Humes deliberately committed both fraud and perjury in representing JFK’s back wounds during the WC Hearings, things take a very different turn during the HSCA hearings. Whoever is behind the concentrated effort to frame Oswald decides to escalate their combined efforts.
I mentioned that the Ida Dox drawings also misrepresented JFK’s wounds, particularly the back wounds, but also the head wounds (You can view the Dox drawings here), (31). Look at Dox’s drawing of the single back wound (below), the same back wound as the Rydberg drawings, same omission of the other three back wounds. One difference is that there is a small cropped image from the actual autopsy photograph included with her drawing, (showing again, only the single wound to JFK’s back). You can read Ida Dox’s HSCA testimony here (32). Reading Dox’s testimony, you can see that she had free access to JFK’s autopsy images, X-rays and doctor’s testimonies . . . everything. She was certainly a great deal more aware of the actual wounds than Rydberg ever was. At this point, I can’t imagine why she opted to recreate the same false back wound representations. At first, it doesn’t make any sense. Ida Dox testified that she used “tracing paper” and placed the paper “directly on the photograph, then all the details were carefully traced” (33). Umm, say what? Ida Dox goes into elaborate explanations on how she traced the photographs of JFK’s wound. She expounds on her exquisite attention to detail, on how many times she made reference to the photos and on and on. Let’s see, you saw four wounds, and “carefully” tracing every detail you end up with one wound? I think Ida Dox and I have a very different idea of what carefully tracing “all” of the details means. If Ida Dox traced every detail, then how in the hell did “Image A” devolve into “Image B” (See Below)? Why is Ida Dox promoting Humes original deception?
It’s very obvious that Ida Dox didn’t copy every detail of JFK’s back wounds. The strange thing is Ida included the body fluid seepage tracks in her drawing…which came from the true entry wound and the lowest fragment exit wound. Didn’t anyone from the HSCA notice these tracks? Didn’t they think to ask her what they were? Or why, if they came from the fake entry wound…why are they spread so wide and so far below the wound she drew (Apparently not)?
Towards the end of Ida Dox’s HSCA testimony she is asked a specific question, and Ms. Dox very smoothly evades the answer.
“Mr. Purdy. Ms. Dox, prior to today, did you have the opportunity to review the enlargements of your drawings to insure that they are accurate?”
“Ms. Dox. Yes I did, I looked at them very, very carefully and they are my drawings except that they are photographically enlarged. They haven’t been altered in any way.” (34)
Ida Dox gives a very clever answer but completely avoids answering the question that she was asked. The question was, “are the drawings accurate”. Do the drawings correctly represent the actual wounds to JFK’s body? How did Ida Dox answer that specific question? She didn’t.
Ida also makes what some might refer to as a little “Freudian slip”. She points out that her drawings weren’t “altered” in any way, but naturally avoids mentioning she altered the photo of JFK’s wounds in her drawings.
Now, I’m asking myself, “Ida, Ida, Ida . . . what are you doing and why are you doing it? I mean, the image she draws is another fraudulent representation of JFK’s wounds. AND she has free access to all of the photos, X-rays and doctors testimonies. My instincts begin to tell me something is going on here that I’m not seeing. I mean, in the first place, the HSCA had the Rydberg drawings, why did they need Dox to redraw what he already had? More importantly, why is she drawing the wound in the same way as Rydberg after viewing the evidence? Then it hits me, clear as a bell and I’m thinking to myself “Oh, you sneaky bastards”. I suddenly realize what Ida Dox is doing and what is being done to poor J.J. Humes. During the HSCA and ARRB hearings, Humes is going to be thrown under the bus, (not that he doesn’t deserve it to some degree). He’s caught in a “catch 22”, damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t; he’s trapped, with no good way out.
One thing I should point out, the probable reason they didn’t re-use the Rydberg drawings is because by this time Harold “skip” Rydberg was trying to get access to the autopsy images to correct his original drawings. That request was denied. Rydberg wasn’t interested in creating more fraudulent drawings; he wanted to fix the ones he already made. So…a new artist became necessary, an artist who I will suggest was willfully complicit to committing fraud and perjury.
I had to read J.J. Humes testimonies (WC, HSCA and ARRB) many times before I noticed what “they” were up to (“they” being the ones orchestrating the frame up of Oswald). This is where we discover that J.J. Humes wasn’t committing this fraud on his own. During the HSCA trial, this is the first time that autopsy images were presented to any of the witnesses, particularly the Parkland Hospital staff and J.J. Humes. It is during the HSCA hearings that “they” decide to escalate the framing of Oswald. Rather than feed us from a bucket of bullshit one spoonful at a time, they decide to trade the spoon for a shovel. Somebody paid attention to Arlen Specters complaints about the bullet trajectory to the back of JFK’s head being too low and difficult to assert the shot came from the TSBD. I will suggest “they” also know a dirty little secret that hasn’t been revealed to this day, but it will be forthcoming tomorrow, on the 22nd of November, in the next article. I know what “they” knew.
It is very important that you understand something related to the autopsy photos. The photos, at the time of the WC hearings, had been under complete control by employees of our government and no one else, remember that. The photos were never seen by anyone in the Warren Commission during their hearings. Only many years later during the HSCA would the images suddenly become available…well, at least the ones selected by “them”. Some autopsy photos to this day have not been seen.
During the HSCA hearings, the escalation of the framing of Oswald becomes a two pronged attack. The first attack is to make the back of head wound (low in the neck at the bottom of the hairline) identified by Humes, Lipsey, Arlen Specter, the autopsy report and the Rydberg drawings to vanish! How do “they” accomplish this task? Well, the job was done so poorly that it would be comical if not for the seriousness of the tragic events that transpired. So, rather than say that this image was manipulated or altered, I will simply say that this image has been “Redacted” (See below).
Does it remind you of anything? Who’s so fond of “redacting” documents by using their black magic markers? Our government is, the same people who had total control of the autopsy images (See next image).
Those crazy guys and their magic markers work wonders! While I call the image redacted, some people…say a lawyer, would be more inclined to give it the term “M.O.” or “Modus Operandi”.
Do you see the bullet entry wound low in the back of the head near the hairline anyplace in the previous image? Nope…”poof”, the wound is all gone. Now, what possible motive would anyone have to make this wound disappear? If you’re trying to frame Oswald, why erase the bullet wound? Guess what? J.J. Humes just began his slide down the slippery slope…(I hear the bus coming). “They” just traded their spoon for the shovel, hoping Americans are hungry. “They” are preparing to move the bullet wound low in the back of the neck up to the top part of the back of the head. “They” also have to stick to the “three shots fired” scenario, so…in adding a new wound, it became necessary to make Humes entry wound disappear. In hiding the lower head wound and creating a new one, they threw Humes under the bus and he is left to fend for himself in the HSCA and ARRB hearings. “They” know that Humes has no choice but to go along with the newest deception, that or destroy his career, possibly risk his life, destroy his image to all of his former students, to his wife and children and possibly risk losing his family. J.J. Humes decides to bite the bullet and remain silent, all while the HSCA and the ARRB portray him as an incompetent buffoon. Humes becomes frustrated, irritated, hostile, defensive and remorseful through the hearings. He’s being made a fool and there is nothing he can do except sacrifice everything in his life or sit back and take it. His silence is ensured.
The next step in escalating the framing of Oswald is to make the back of head blow out (seen by over 20 witnesses) also disappear. Many of the witnesses were Parkland Hospital staff and the disappearance of the back of head blowout caused a great deal of stress and disbelief among them. The following image shows some of the witnesses showing where they saw the back of head blowout.
(Witnesses above: Beverly Oliver, Phillip Willis, Marilyn Willis, Ed Hoffman, Dr. Robert McClelland, Dr Paul Peters, Dr Kenneth Salyer, Dr Charles Carrico, Dr. Richard Dulaney, Dr. Ronald Jones, Nurse Aubrey Bell, Theran Ward, Aubrey Rike, Frank O’neill, Jerrod Custer, Paul O’Conner and Floyd Riebe)
None of the autopsy images presented to the HSCA or the ARRB show this blowout in the back of the head, yet all of these witnesses insist it was there. Let me explain something, a complete intact photo of the back of JFK’s head after the assassination was and is a virtual IMPOSSIBILITY without manipulation or alteration! Yet, that is precisely what was shown to witnesses during the HSCA hearings. How was this photo “IMPOSSIBLE”? Very simple, two large fragments were blown off of JFK’s head when he was shot. One of those fragments was found in the President’s limo on the floor by the Secret Service the night of the assassination. However, the second fragment, commonly called the “Harper” fragment (after the person who found it) was not discovered until after the autopsy (35) AND the work by the morticians had been completed AND after JFK’s body had been removed from Bethesda for funeral services. The morticians testified they packed JFK’s empty brain cavity with Plaster of Paris, sewed rubber onto the back of his neck, and then applied the necessary make-up to complete their work (36). The morticians finished around 5am Saturday morning per J.J. Humes testimonies. The Harper fragment would not even be found for several hours later on Elm St. on Saturday, in Dealey Plaza. The assassination and autopsy took place on Friday the previous day. The morticians noted that they could not close the entire back of the skull, due to the missing bone fragment. The Harper fragment is not a small fragment either (See next image).
This fragment is nearly three inches wide and about two and a half inches tall. This fragment was noted as being from the Occipital region per J.J. Humes (37). The Occipital region of the skull is the back of the head. One of the images presented during the HSCA hearings is the following image (See Below). Note the large white oblong oval white area under the hair, in the same general area as where all of the Parkland witnesses claimed they saw the blowout (Where the white arrow is pointing).
As I said, this image is a virtual IMPOSSIBILITY without manipulation or alteration due to the fragment missing when the morticians were finished, and JFK’s body had left Bethesda hospital (Before the Harper fragment even arrived)! Yet, here it is, a photo with JFK’s skull complete and intact. To emphasize the point, see the next image to compare where the witnesses state the blowout was located, and where the white oblong spot shows up on JFK’s head. The drawings of the skulls were circled by different medical witnesses as to the approximation to where the blowout was located.
J. Thorton Boswell was one of the autopsy surgeons who worked on the autopsy with J.J. Humes. Harry Livingston had questioned Dr. Boswell on this particular wound and wrote about it in his book, “High Treason 2”.
Livingston: “The men—I was at Joseph Gawler’s funeral home the other day and Joe Hagen, the president, and his cosmetologist and so on described to me reassembling his (JFK’s) head at the end and they stated that when they had finished there was still an area in the back of the head just in the occipital-parietal area probably three inches across, that there was not enough scalp to cover that. But nobody could see it because the head was on the pillow—“
Livingston: “And that’s the way you remember it”?
Livingston: “That there was no scalp there”?
Livingston: “And that was basically the area where the large defect was”.
Boswell: “Well, that defect was a lot larger—do you mean in the skull”?
Livingston: “Yes. That area of missing scalp was in the center of a larger defect”.
Boswell: “Well, no, it was more posterior than the defect in the scalp…”
As Boswell stated, “more posterior in the skull”. Posterior meaning in the back of the head, as witnesses show and stated in their testimonies. Dr. Boswell would go on to say in the same chapter that the bullet entry wound to the back of JFK’s skull (per the Bethesda autopsy report) was below this larger wound. So, the autopsy doctor agrees with the witnesses, including the morticians from Gawler’s Funeral Home who prepped JFK for funeral services. Dr. Boswell also agreed that this area of missing scalp/bone fragment was approximately 3 inches long, which just happens to be the approximate width of the Harper fragment. A fragment noted to have come from the posterior of JFK’s skull. Whoever touched up this photo, obviously went to some lengths to cover up the oblong white spot, but was not entirely successful. The white spot is the Plaster of Paris the morticians used to pack JFK’s empty brain cavity, as they stated. This same Plaster of Paris can also be seen in one of JFK’s X-rays.
So the first part in escalating the framing of Oswald was to make J.J. Humes back of head “entry” wound disappear. The second part was to make this blowout disappear. There were three very good reasons for this. The first was necessary, hiding the bullet wound low in the back of JFK’s head, because “they” are preparing to move the wound up toward the top of the back of the head. Second, since “they” allege only three shots were fired, “they” can’t just out of the blue add an extra bullet hole as that would make four shots, meaning a second shooter. Third, the large back of head blow out indicates an exit wound from a frontal head shot, also adding another shooter…none of these is what “they” want. “They” are attempting to stick to the 3 shot, Lone Assassin Theory”, whatever it takes. Yes, there was a frontal head shot, and I will get to that soon. Sherri Fiester has already discussed this shot at length in her book “Enemy of the Truth”. I highly recommend that you read it.
What I haven’t told you is that I know J.J. Humes and Ida Dox’s handler’s dirty little secret. I know why Ida Dox is moving the head wound up in her drawings. People were paying attention to Arlen Specter’s complaint that the bullet trajectory was too low to try and connect it to the TSBD. But there is a much bigger reason why “they” don’t want you looking too closely at the bullet wound low in the back of JFK’s head, a reason they made it vanish. Moving the head wound up in the back of JFK’s head isn’t just to continue the framing of Oswald by making the bullet trajectory a better match to the TSBD, it is to keep you from discovering what they’ve been desperate to hide. What might that be? The fact that the kill shot, the first fatal head shot…didn’t even come from the TSBD! Don’t believe it? Maybe what you see tomorrow will change your mind.If this fatal bullet didn’t come from the TSBD, Oswald didn’t kill Kennedy, it’s just that simple. This head shot from behind, hit a fraction of a a second before the head shot from the front…”Pow, Pow”…very close together, stay tuned, exposing the first dirty secret tomorrow.