THE DALLAS ACTION #107~ April 8,2017: “The Lansdale Deviation.”

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW #107 HAS UPLOADED! CLICK THIS LINK TO LISTEN/DOWNLOAD FREE: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/107-april-8-2017-the-lansdale-deviation

  

 IN THIS EPISODE~ Since the release of Oliver Stone’s film “JFK” and the widespread exposure of the works of L. Fletcher Prouty it has, it seems, become practically an act of heresy to suggest for a moment that Air Force General Ed Lansdale was *not* the Operational Mastermind behind Dealey Plaza.(And to suggest that Lansdale MIGHT NOT be the man in the 3 Tramps photo with his back to the camera will actually get you *called names*, too. TRUST me).

   By the Conspiracy Believers, we are told that Lansdale was an Operationally Gifted Covert Ops Golden Boy, lauded and respected for his Clandestine Genius and by everybody in DC that mattered, including deposed & disgraced ex Agency head Allen Dulles.

   But if we study the Declassified Official Primary Source Documentation of Cuban Ops *recorded before the assassination*, the personal and professional opinions & observations of folks with names like Hunt, Helms & Harvey recorded therein paint an entirely different picture of Lansdale and his “Covert Operational Prowess.”

   PLUS~ using nothing but Primary Resource Material discovered at the Kennedy Presidential Library earlier this year by author  Michael Swanson, you and I will *completely* dispell & dismiss the idea that it was Allen Dulles who went to Air Force Chief-Of-Staff Curtis Lemay and got Lansdale his promotion to General, and you may be surprised to find out just who DID.

Advertisements

Lee Harvey Oswald, Russia and the CIA

Lee Harvey Oswald, Russia and the CIA.

By S.r. Dusty Rohde

©March, 2017

In the past 53 years, so much emphasis has been placed on possible connections between Lee Harvey Oswald and the CIA, I thought it might be worthwhile to point out a few facts on the subject.

Typically, the CIA’s operational jurisdiction lays outside United States borders, not within them. Operational jurisdiction within U.S. borders falls upon the FBI, or at least in 1963. Other agencies, like the Department of Homeland Security were created after this time period.

The “Cold War” with Russia was at it’s peak during the Kennedy administration in the 60’s. However, the Cold War didn’t officially end until 1991. In the 1980’s and part of the 90’s, I worked for the DOD overseas, on a remote island, requiring top secret security clearance. Only 12 people were allowed on this island (out of several hundred that worked there every day), and I was one of the 12. Anyone besides these 12 individuals caught on island after 4:30 pm would result in their immediate arrest, no excuses accepted. These hundreds of employees were flown on and off island everyday. (See below)

“In 1983, Cold War tensions between the United States and Soviet Union had escalated to a level not seen since the Cuban Missile Crisis because of several factors. These included the United States’ Strategic Defense Initiative, its planned deployment of the Pershing II Weapon System in Europe in March and April, and FleetEx ’83, the largest naval exercise held to date in the North Pacific.[28] The military hierarchy of the Soviet Union (particularly the old guard led by Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov and Minister of Defence Dmitriy Ustinov) viewed these actions as bellicose and destabilizing; they were deeply suspicious of U.S. President Ronald Reagan’s intentions and openly fearful he was planning a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the Soviet Union. These fears culminated in RYAN, the code name for a secret intelligence-gathering program initiated by Andropov to detect a potential nuclear sneak attack which he believed Reagan was plotting.[29]”

Our “mission” was part of the Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as “H.O.E.” (the Homing Overlay Experiment). This involved testing of ICBM missiles and developing the missile defense shield.

Part of the requirements of maintaining our security clearances involved constant check-ups by numerous government law enforcement agencies. Those agencies could and would include the GSA, NSA, DEA, CIA, FBI, and a whole host of others. It was not unusual for me  or my co-workers to get phone calls from these agencies asking questions related to our co-workers every couple of months. These questions were often…”do you know if this person has been to a Communist country? Do you know if this person has had contact with anyone in a Communist country? Do you know if this person has any outstanding debts? Does this person drink excessively? There were usually several other questions, all along the same vein. This was and still is a common practice.

Those 12 of us who actually lived on the island had no way off of the island, except by plane, helicopter or swimming. Planes only flew on a set schedule (Army Caribou’s), and helicopters (Huey’s) depending on necessity. My co-workers and I tried unsuccessfully to get the Army to allow us to have a boat. We were told flat “NO”! So then we put in a request to have a raft or kayak’s….again the Army’s response was “NO”! The Army stated they didn’t want us to have anything like that because it would make it to easy for someone to take classified or Top Secret material off island. The main reason we wanted a boat, raft or kayak was because every time we had a “mission”, Russian spy ships would show up, and they didn’t always respect the three mile limit, several times they were within a mile of the island. I should mention, this island was only 450 feet wide at it’s widest point, and it wasn’t very long either. There were often discussion’s on what we would do if the Russian’s tried to invade or take over the island, as we had no way off, at least none that would be quick enough, except to swim. The Russian spy ship was called by the code name “Brand X”. (See below)

This image above is not the exact same ship, but it was similar in appearance to this one, but with a few dish radar added to it.

During these discussions, a topic that also came up was the fact that we weren’t allowed to have any conventional type weapons on the island, (only security forces had them). That means no guns. But, we did have high tech cross bows, under water bang sticks of various calibers, like 12 gauge, .357 or .22 calibers. We also had custom made knives and practiced martial arts on a regular basis.

Even though we couldn’t have boats of any type, we did have scuba gear, and places we could hide that Russians wouldn’t be able to spot us easily. We would be able to hear anyone approaching long before they saw us. This location included us donning our scuba gear, and if spotted, we would simply swim away using our underwater gear. The point being, we had no intentions of becoming Russian prisoners. These concerns were very real, and at one point the situation would become very tense.

On September 1st, 1983…I was off duty. That same day, we got shocking reports that KAL flight 007 had been shot down (a civilian airline). This aircraft had briefly passed through the North American Aerospace Defense Command buffer zone, which was off limits to civilian airlines. This was for their own protection as the area was used for missile testing. This would give rise to some conspiracy theorists to claim the aircraft was shot down by the USA with missiles, but this wasn’t true. The aircraft was in fact shot down by the Russians. We got the reports of the shooting down of the aircraft long before the MSM reported anything about it. We had a countdown to a mission “launch” and Brand X had been hanging around for a couple of days already. Later that evening, around 9 pm, I happened to be walking outside and it was a very dark, moonless night. Suddenly I heard a helicopter fly by fast overhead, but I couldn’t see it, it had no lights on. I knew immediately it wasn’t a Huey, as they have a very distinctive “wap, wap, wap” sound. I had never heard this type of helicopter before and it buzzed the island fast…and directly across the runway, which got my attention instantly.  Then more helicopters buzzed the island, travelling fast, from all different directions. I was getting more than a little concerned as I had no idea if these were our helicopters or Russian helicopters. The fact that they were crossing the island, and over the runway at all different angles was very abnormal and unsafe. I was just about to decide to make for the scuba gear when all of a sudden parachute flares started popping all over and around the island. That’s when I started thinking “shit, shit, shit”! What the hell is going on? (See below)

Those of us on the island weren’t given any advance warning these helicopters would be showing up. Often times, during missions, we had a mini-sub at the island, but it only held two people, and it wasn’t likely they were going to let us take it. Besides, we didn’t know how to operate it anyhow. As it turned out, the helicopters were ours, meaning the U.S.A. This was an attack squadron of Apache helicopters sent to the island by President Reagan to guard the island against any potential Russian attack. (See below)

This squadron was under orders to “blow up” or “shoot down” any ship or aircraft that got outside normal shipping lanes or flight paths. Needless to say, I made a point of not leaving the island until after these guys left. As you might imagine, tensions were very high for a week or two.

A few days prior to these events, I and some co-workers had some friends who got special clearance to spend the night on the island, so we could do a night dive. None of us had done a night dive before and this dive had been planned prior to the shooting down of KAL-007, prior to Brand X showing up…and prior the Apache attack squadron showing up. With all of this unexpected activity going on, we all sat down and discussed the wisdom of us still doing the night dive, as Brand X was still there and tensions were high. We finally decided “to hell with it”, getting the permissions was a pain in the backside, and we were all there so we decided to do the dive.

There were six of us on this dive team, about an hour after sundown, we headed out with our gear and started our dive from one end of the island. We all had dive lights, and we worked our way down the length of the island, slowly. We ran into a problem almost immediately, as one by one, the light bulbs in the dive lights burned out. If a person’s light burned out, they just paired up with some one who’s light still worked. By the time we got near to the other end of the island, we were down to only one person with a light bulb. We were swimming, when a good sized shark (about a 12 footer) swam through the light beam, and. . . that is exactly when the last bulb decided to burn out (yeah, that sucks, as I’ve been attacked by sharks before this). Now it was pitch black, and virtually impossible to see anything at all under water, so we surfaced. We knew we would have to get out of the water, we also knew at least one shark was buzzing us and we couldn’t see him. The problem being, the reef was coral and razor sharp, covered with sea urchins and hungry eels, and dozens of poisonous lion fish out feeding. Still, we had no choice, we had to get out . . . I decided to get out first, carefully placing my flippered feet on boulders and grabbing rocks with my hands. I pulled myself up quickly out of the water and stepped up with one foot onto the island. I stepped up with the other foot, and no sooner did my foot hit the ground, I heard several clacking noises. I was looking down at my feet when I got out of the water, but I knew what the clacking sound was long before I saw it. The noise was automatic rifles being locked and loaded. About the same time that I looked up, I saw 5 members of the security forces pointing their rifles at me and screaming “freeze, freeze”. I shouted back at them “Whoa, whoa, whoa….take it easy”. The shouting match went back and forth for a minute or two, them telling me to put my hands up, etc, …me trying to calm these pumped up and paranoid security guys down and keep them from pulling a trigger. They thought we were divers coming from the Russian spy ship Brand X, and I remember yelling back at them “do you see any hammers and sickles on my scuba gear”, “am I speaking Russian”….hellooooo! Finally, I got the security guys to calm down and the rest of the guys on the dive team decided it was safe to get out of the water (up to this point I guess they decided they were safer with the sharks than the security guys). Apparently, the security guys had been tracking our lights along the island, and seeing them go out one by one, thought we were trying to sneak on island unobserved. Eventually everything calmed down and we went out separate ways. So why tell this story?

As high as the tensions were on the island at this time, tensions were at similar levels in 1963, but all across the United States. Fear of nuclear war was real, on both sides of the fence. While I was overseas on this island, and even today…going to a communist country or having contact with people from communist countries would be an immediate red flag to the CIA. You would be most likely to have an immediate loss of any security clearance under those circumstances. This is not a subject taken lightly. . .then or now. So if you wonder, would Lee Harvey Oswald have been watched and checked out by the CIA while he was in Russia? That is almost a certainty. That is part of what the CIA does, safeguards America’s “sensitive” information and protects against foreign subversion, etc. This falls directly within the CIA’s jurisdiction and scope of work.This is something I would fully expect the CIA to do, from personal experience. Not only that, it would be a normal part of their function to check up on people with security clearances, which Oswald did have while in the military. Checking up on Oswald, or keeping tabs on him by the CIA under these circumstances doesn’t mean he was in the CIA. Of course, if he was in the CIA, you never would have known about it because the CIA sure as heck wouldn’t have admitted it, and doubly not, if he was in Russia . . . to do so would make Oswald immediately eligible to be executed as a spy and with zero protection under the Geneva convention.

While I concur totally that Oswald was working for, or made to believe he was working for an agency after returning to the USA, I haven’t seen anything to suggest it was the CIA. Here again, the CIA doesn’t have operational jurisdiction within US borders. There are indications where the CIA involved themselves in regards to certain pieces of evidence, like the false photo and tape recording of Oswald in Mexico and a few other things. But, here again, this doesn’t make Oswald an asset or agent of the CIA. It’s true that the CIA came to the aid of Clay Shaw during Garrisons trial, but this doesn’t mean Oswald was an asset or agent. If Oswald was connected to an agency, and there is powerful evidence of that, I have little doubt he was directly connected to the FBI.

Me at work overseas, the person shown at far left, in the space suit . . . was I working for the CIA? Nope. (See below)

 

 

 

 

Deception de la Mort, Encadrement Lee Harvey Oswald

Deception de la Mort, Encadrement Lee Harvey Oswald

Écrit par S.r. Dusty Rohde

©Novembre, 2016

REMERCIEMENTS:

J’aimerais remercier tout particulièrement Gayle Nix-Jackson, Michael Doherty et Ted Rubenstein, qui ont contribué à déclencher les chemins qui ont mené aux découvertes dans les prochains articles. En outre, un remerciement particulier à Linda Giovanna Zambanini pour l’écoute et l’aide constante avec mes demandes.

PROLOGUE
Pendant 53 ans, une bataille a fait rage entre deux groupes. Les groupes sont les «Lone Nutters» (LNer’s) et les «Conspiracy Theorists» (CTer’s). Ces deux groupes ont des points de vue opposés sur la question de savoir si le président John F. Kennedy a été assassiné par Lee Harvey Oswald, ou par d’autres qui ont réussi à commettre un coup d’État en Amérique.
Le président John F. Kennedy a été assassiné le 22 novembre 1963 à Dealey Plaza, à Dallas, au Texas. Lee Harvey Oswald, la personne marquée comme l’assassin de JFK a été lui-même assassiné deux jours plus tard, alors qu’il était en garde à vue par le propriétaire du Carousel Club, Jack Ruby. Jack Ruby était copains avec une grande partie des employés de la police de Dallas et avait de nombreux liens avec le crime organisé.

Après avoir étudié l’assassinat JFK depuis des années, j’ai découvert il ya longtemps une montagne de désinformation en existence liée à ce cas. Cette désinformation vient des deux côtés de la clôture, c’est-à-dire de «LNer» et «CTer». Une grande partie de cette désinformation a été délibérée, et certains accidentels. Aucune de ces fausses informations n’a bénéficié d’une résolution à l’affaire d’assassinat; Toutes les fausses informations sont trompeuses et paralysent toute compréhension de ce qui s’est passé ce jour fatidique. La Commission Warren elle-même a délibérément présenté de fausses preuves relatives aux blessures de JFK. Le FBI de Hoover a retenu des preuves et continue de le faire encore aujourd’hui. La CIA continue de refuser la publication de leurs dossiers sur l’assassinat. Les témoins ont bénéficié de l’immunité de témoignage, dont les dossiers ont été rapidement scellés. Est-ce que toute cette tromperie protégeait Lee Harvey Oswald, le soi-disant «Lone Assassin», et un homme déjà assassiné? Je ne le crois pas. Si Lee était si coupable et un «assassin solitaire», pourquoi tout ce drame?

Mes tâches ou buts dans ce chapitre sont double. La première tâche consiste à vous présenter, le lecteur, des preuves fondées sur des faits (y compris corrigées). La deuxième tâche consiste à fournir une compréhension claire et précise de ces éléments de preuve. Si je réussis dans ces deux buts, je n’ai aucun doute que ce qui s’est vraiment passé à Dallas commencera à devenir alarmante claire pour vous.
Le plus jeune président de l’histoire américaine a été assassiné le 22 novembre 1963. . . Mais ce n’était pas Lee Harvey Oswald qui l’a tué. Trois hommes sont morts ce week-end, Kennedy, Oswald et le policier de la police de Dallas, J.D. Tippit. Un quatrième homme a été grièvement blessé, le gouverneur John Connally. Aucun d’entre eux ne méritait leur sort.
Lee Harvey Oswald a rapidement été qualifié de «communiste», de «Lone Nut» et de «Lone Assassin». Oswald a été blâmé pour les blessures à Kennedy, Connally et Tippit, mais ces allégations ne sont pas vraies. Malheureusement, l’ex-épouse de Lee (Marina Oswald), sa mère Marguerite, ses deux filles (June et Rachel) et son frère (Robert) devraient tous porter le fardeau de la prétendue culpabilité de Lee pendant 53 ans.
Après des centaines et des milliers d’heures d’examen de la preuve, j’espère que ce que je révèle ici aujourd’hui coule po J’espère que finalement les Américains vont commencer à saisir la profondeur de la déception impliquant ces meurtres, avec une plus grande perception que jamais. Ce n’est pas la fin de la preuve prouvant le cadrage d’Oswald, c’est le début.

S.R. “Dusty” Rohde

CHAPITRE I

(Encadrement Lee Harvey Oswald)

La Commission Warren était l’organe d’enquête (de l’assassinat de JFK) nommé par le président Lyndon Baines Johnson, dirigé par le juge en chef Earl Warren. Johnson a été assermenté comme président à Love Field sur Air Force One, à Dallas, au Texas, peu après JFK a été assassiné.

Howard P. Willens était l’un des trois membres qui composaient le «personnel de supervision» du WC. Dans le livre de Willens «L’histoire nous prouvera le droit», il déclare: «J’ai été témoin de la rigueur, de la gravité et de l’intégrité avec lesquelles la Commission Warren a abordé sa tâche» (1). A cela je dois objecter. Willens a également proclamé «la critique de notre travail est sérieusement mal orientée» (2). Par la définition de Willens, je suis mal orienté. Dans ma défense, je ne peux que dire «au moins, je n’ai pas délibérément tromper le public américain», la Commission Warren et House Select Comité sur les assassinats a fait. Évidemment, je vais devoir justifier cette déclaration. En ce qui concerne la «minutie» par le WC va, je mentionnerai seulement que dans la communauté de recherche de JFK, le travail de la commission de Warren est communément appelé Warren Omissions. Cela est principalement dû à la quantité considérable de preuves qui n’ont pas été examinées, aux témoins qui n’ont pas été interrogés et ainsi de suite. Le label a beaucoup de validité, mais ce n’est pas la zone que je veux couvrir dans cet article. Je m’intéresse davantage à l’examen de l’intégrité du WC et de son sérieux allégué. En d’autres termes, le WC a-t-il dit la vérité, toute la vérité et rien que la vérité? Est-ce que le «comité de sélection de la Chambre sur les assassinats» (HSCA)? La réponse est non.

Le personnel de l’hôpital Parkland (à Dallas) a travaillé à l’origine sur JFK et John Connally immédiatement après qu’ils aient été blessés à Dealey Plaza. Plusieurs membres du personnel de Parkland ont ensuite été convoqués à titre de témoins lors des audiences de la Commission. Ces membres du personnel de Parkland ont délibérément montré de fausses images (avec des dessins d’artiste) représentant la tête de JFK et les blessures du dos (3). Ces images étaient une collection de dessins trompeurs supposés représenter les blessures de JFK. L’artiste Harold “Skip” Rydberg a été mandaté par le WC pour effectuer leur travail nécessaire (4). Artiste Ida Dox a été commandé plus tard en 1978 par l’HSCA pour créer plus d’artistes rendus des plaies de JFK. Les dessins d’Ida Dox donnent aussi de fausses représentations des blessures de JFK, mais dans ce cas, Ida Dox est responsable de toute fausse représentation des plaies de JFK. C’est parce que Ida Dox a eu accès aux images d’autopsie de JFK, aux rayons X et aux témoins précédents des audiences de WC; Elle les rapportait souvent (5). Le personnel de l’hôpital Parkland serait de nouveau appelé à donner des témoignages par l’ACSS en 1978, mais cette fois-ci, on leur montrerait de nouveaux dessins et des photographies modifiées illustrant des blessures fausses ou disparaissantes.

Je prétends que les fausses représentations de blessures ont été faites à travers deux interprétations d’artistes différents, un artiste qui savait quand ils ont créé les images qu’ils étaient faux, et un artiste qui n’a pas. La tromperie ne s’est pas arrêtée là. La tromperie est passée de dessins frauduleux à des tromperies photographiques modifiées présentées aux témoins de l’hôpital Parkland (lors des audiences de l’ACCS). Les photos les choquaient et les confondaient, ce que les images montraient, ce n’était pas les plaies du corps de JFK que ces témoins ont vu ou souvenu.

Avant que je montre les preuves médicales qui ont été mal représentées et comment, je veux que vous vous familiarisiez avec cette déclaration faite par Arlen Specter au personnel de WC. Arlen Spectre, en qualité de conseiller adjoint de la Commission Warren, a été le créateur de la «théorie de la balle unique» (6), qui impliquait l’utilisation de la balle «Pristine» (7). Bien que sa théorie soit erronée (démontrée dans cet article, je dois donner à M. Spectre le crédit pour la déclaration suivante.) Cette déclaration a été envoyée par Arlen Specter à MJ Lee Rankin, «conseiller général» de la Commission Warren. «La Commission doit déterminer avec certitude qu’il n’y a pas de grandes variations entre les films et les dessins de l’artiste. Les pièces de la commission n os 385, 386 et 388 ont été faites à partir des souvenirs des chirurgiens d’autopsie qui ont été racontés à l’artiste. Peut comparer les films et les dessins de l’artiste et trouver une erreur significative qui pourrait affecter substantiellement le témoignage essentiel et les conclusions de la Commission »(8). Cette déclaration de M. Spectre était très prophétique, parce que« un jour »est aujourd’hui, ici et maintenant Le personnel de la Commission Warren aurait dû écouter M. Spectre, et M. Spectre savait que les représentations artistiques n’étaient pas exactes et a tenté d’avertir le WC de son utilisation prévue. De l’embarras futur, mais ses paroles sont tombées dans l’oreille d’un sourd.

Dans le cas de Harold “Skip” Rydberg, ses dessins des blessures à JFK n’ont pas été délibérément faussés par son propre fait. M. Rydberg a reçu l’ordre de J.J. Humes quant à l’endroit où placer les plaies dans les dessins (9). Au moment des dessins, Rydberg n’avait jamais vu aucune des photographies réelles des blessures ou du corps lui-même, il était totalement dépendant de J.J. Humes pour donner des descriptions précises des plaies de JFK (10). J.J. Humes, en tant que chef chirurgien d’autopsie était certainement très familier avec les blessures de JFK et leurs emplacements. La responsabilité pour les erreurs dans les rendus d’artistes tombe directement sur les épaules Humes comme l’origine des erreurs dans les lieux de blessure. Vous pouvez sacrément bien parier que Humes savait mieux, il savait où les blessures d’entrée ont été, mais faussement identifié, par Rydberg. Ce que je dis, c’est que le commandant Humes, avec toute sa connaissance et son intention, était le créateur de la localisation des blessures frauduleuses et de l’identification. La question que nous devons nous poser est pourquoi Humes faire cela? Pourquoi Humes risque-t-il son grade et sa carrière de tenter une fraude? Il est vrai que Humes aurait pu le faire de sa propre volonté, mais le risque d’être pris aurait été considérable. Cette option, bien que possible, ne semble pas très probable. La seule raison plausible, je peux penser, c’est que quelqu’un au-dessus de la chaîne lui a ordonné de le faire. Humes n’a pas été invité à signer un accord de non-divulgation, mais commettre une fraude assurerait son silence. D’autres personnes impliquées dans l’autopsie ont été amenées à signer des ententes de non-divulgation ou ont dit de ne pas parler de l’autopsie par des représentants du gouvernement. Humes savait que ces gens ne parleraient pas longtemps. Humes était également conscient que les images d’autopsie étaient les plus susceptibles de ne jamais être libéré, car c’était contre ses souhaits et prétendument ceux du procureur général Robert Kennedy et de la famille Kennedy. Humes ignorait que, plusieurs années plus tard, la HSCA serait formée pour entamer une nouvelle enquête sur l’assassinat de JFK ou que certaines des images d’autopsie seraient disponibles. Si les images ne ressemblaient pas aux plaies de JFK, peu de gens connaîtraient la véritable étendue des blessures de JFK ou les déceptions délibérées commises par Humes et Ida Dox pendant les audiences de la WC et de l’HSCA.

Donc, plutôt que de simplement parler de la blessure fausses déclarations et des tromperies, je vais vous les montrer. Les images de Rydberg sont des expositions CE385, CE386 et CE388 (11), (12).

Les trois images montrées ci-dessus sont les dessins des blessures de JFK créées par Harold Rydberg, selon les descriptions de blessures qui lui ont été données par J.J. Humes.

Je vais aborder les erreurs de pose de plaie sur l’image centrale (CE 386) d’abord, car cela montre directement les fausses représentations de CE 385 et CE 388. Les deux blessures d’entrée dans CE 386 sont dans les mauvaises positions, les deux plaies sont Montrés plus haut qu’ils étaient réellement et ce n’était pas un accident. Vérifier que ces plaies sont localisées de manière inexacte; Je vais me reporter au témoignage donné par le 2e lieutenant Richard Lipsey lors des audiences de l’ACCS. Le Lt Lipsey était présent pendant la majorité de l’autopsie de JFK à l’hôpital Bethesda (13). Lipsey a été ordonné par Generel Wehle de rester avec le corps en tout temps. Le 2e lieutenant Richard Lipsey était l’aide du général Wehle, qui était chargé des arrangements funéraires et des événements connexes. La référence de M. Lipsey à cette blessure particulière est celle où il parle d’une balle entrant «à l’arrière de la tête» ou «haut dans le cou», mais «dans la ligne des cheveux» et se termine dans la «éruption “. Le témoignage de Lipsey peut être entendu à ce lien (14). Vous pouvez également lire le témoignage de Lipsey transcrit à ce lien (15).

M. Lipsey indique spécifiquement que la blessure d’entrée à l’arrière de la tête de JFK était «dans la ligne des cheveux», ce qui signifie que les cheveux de JFK se termine au niveau du bord inférieur, à l’arrière du cou. Il déclare également que cette blessure d’entrée était un «trou rond». Ainsi, alors que le dessin de Rydberg dans CE 386 montre la blessure d’entrée ronde, il est placé trop haut. Arlen Spector déclare également qu’aucun des médecins de l’hôpital Parkland de Dallas n’a observé le trou dans le dos du président ou le petit trou dans la partie inférieure de sa tête (16). Le fait que le personnel de l’hôpital de Parkland ait ou non vu la blessure au dos ou la petite blessure d’entrée à la tête de JFK n’est pas important. Ce qui importe, c’est que, ici, Arlen Spectre se réfère également à la même blessure de balle notée par M. Lipsey. Arlen Spectre remarquait des objections spécifiques aux dessins de Rydberg: «Le dessin des artistes préparé à Bethesda (CE n ° 385 et 386) montre un léger angle de déclinaison. Il est difficile, sinon impossible, d’expliquer un tel angle de déclin »(17). . . Se référant à l’angle de trajectoire nécessaire pour prouver que le tir est venu du Texas School Book Depository (TSBD). De là, les choses vont de mal en pis. C’est parce que Arlen Specter a fait ces observations, il n’avait jamais vu le corps de JFK ou les photographies d’Autopsie (18). Si nous corrigeons les emplacements de blessure (en les déplaçant vers les positions correctes), cela diminue l’angle de déclinaison à un degré encore plus élevé!

À ce stade, j’ai corrigé l’emplacement de la tête de JFK (entrée) et vous pouvez voir comment cela modifie considérablement la trajectoire de la plaie (voir image suivante).

Si Spectre pensait qu’il serait difficile d’expliquer un tel angle de déclin avec les blessures dans les endroits faux, il devient beaucoup plus difficile à partir des emplacements corrigés! Voici votre premier indice majeur que quelque chose n’était pas juste dans la maison de la tromperie. Bien sûr, comme je l’ai dit, Arlen Specter n’avait aucune idée que les blessures réelles étaient inférieures à ce qui était montré dans les dessins de Rydberg, s’il avait su qu’il aurait regardé en incrédulité, sachant qu’il devrait prouver que ce coup est venu pour le sixième étage Du TSBD.

(* Note des auteurs: Je ne veux pas que vous pensiez que la trajectoire montrée dans l’image ci-dessus est la trajectoire exacte, elle n’est pas, mais elle est très proche).

La blessure au cou représentée dans les dessins de Rydberg crée un problème bien plus important que la blessure à la tête. En premier lieu, là encore, la blessure est montrée bien au-dessus de l’emplacement réel de la plaie. Dans les dessins de Rydberg, la deuxième blessure est montrée en fait dans le cou de JFK, ce qui n’était pas le cas. J.J. Humes a dû savoir que cette blessure n’était pas dans le cou de JFK. Comment ne le pouvait-il pas? La seule raison pour déplacer cette blessure à partir de son emplacement réel était dans le seul but de créer une fausse trajectoire de balle vers le bas (montrée dans CE 385) et de tenter de créer une trajectoire qui serait un match plus proche du sixième étage snipers nid. En corrigeant l’emplacement de la plaie par les images d’autopsie JFK, nous arriverions avec une nouvelle trajectoire (voir image suivante).

Maintenant, rappelez-vous, Arlen Specter avait des doutes sur la preuve que les coups de feu provenaient du TSBD à partir de leurs points d’entrée faux. Comme on le voit dans l’image ci-dessus, le point d’entrée allégué, par J.J. Humes était dans le cou. La blessure réelle Humes se réfère à est en dessous de la ligne de l’épaule d’environ un pouce et demi. Specter aurait certainement beaucoup plus de mal à prouver que les plans provenaient du TSBD à partir des nouveaux points d’entrée corrigés et des trajectoires qui en résultent, mais. . . Les choses obtiennent toujours beaucoup, bien pire, comme si elles ne sont pas déjà assez mal.

Arlen Spectre a développé la «Théorie de la balle unique», (une seule balle passait par JFK et le Gouverneur John Connally), basée sur des lieux de blessures fictives et de fausses trajectoires. Mais il y a autre chose que M. Spectre ne savait pas. Non seulement J.J. Humes déformer les lieux de la blessure, il a faussement identifié un fragment “Sortie” blessure comme une blessure d’entrée! La prétendue «blessure d’entrée» présentée par J.J. Humes, n’est pas une blessure d’entrée du tout, c’est une blessure EXIT! L’ensemble de la théorie de balle unique et la trajectoire associée est basée sur deux blessures de sortie! Les gens, le SBT est sur le point de monter en flammes.

Ne le croyez pas? Vous verrez, après avoir vu la prochaine édition demain … rester à l’écoute pour un choc!

CITATIONS

Chapitre un:

 

1. «L’histoire nous prouvera», par Howard P. Willens, page 12.
2. «L’histoire nous prouvera», par Howard P. Willens, page 12.
3. Témoignages médicaux, Commission Warren, Vol.
4. ARRB Témoignage de James Joseph Humes, page 227, http://assassinationofjfk.net/for-the-sake-of-historical-accuracy/

5. HSCA Témoignage d’Ida Dox, page 147, http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol1/html/HSCA_Vol1_0076a.htm
6. “Théorie de la balle unique”, https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Single_Bullet_Theory.html
7. “Balle vierge”, (CE 399) http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0038a.htm
8. JFK Pièce n ° 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=98&tab=page

9. ARRB Témoignage de James Joseph Humes, page 229, http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/humesa.htm
10. Déclaration de Harold “Skip” Rydberg, http://assassinationofjfk.net/for-the-sake-of-historical-accuracy/
11. Dessins de Rydberg, (CE385, CE386), https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pdf/WH16_CE_385.pdf
12. Rydberg Drawing, (CE388), https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pdf/WH16_CE_388.pdf

13. Lipsey Doc
14. Lipsey, Richard A., Témoignage vidéo, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9UZz07eNMc
15. Lipsey, Richard A., HSCA Témoignage, http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/med_testimony/Lipsey_1-18-78/HSCA-Lipsey.htm
16. JFK Pièce n ° 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page
17. JFK Pièce n ° 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page
18. JFK Pièce n ° 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page

 

 

 

Engaño de la muerte, Enmarcado de Lee Harvey Oswald

Engaño de la muerte, Enmarcado de Lee Harvey Oswald

Con S.r. Dusty Rohde

©Noviembre, 2016

EXPRESIONES DE GRATITUD:

Quiero agradecer especialmente a Gayle Nix-Jackson, Michael Doherty y Ted Rubenstein, todos los que ayudaron a desencadenar los caminos que condujeron a los descubrimientos en los próximos artículos. También, un agradecimiento especial a Linda Giovanna Zambanini para escuchar y ayuda constante con mis peticiones.

PRÓLOGO
Durante 53 años, una batalla ha estado haciendo estragos entre dos grupos. Los grupos son los “Lone Nutters” (LNer’s) y los “Teóricos de la Conspiración” (CTer’s). Estos dos grupos tienen puntos de vista opuestos sobre si el presidente John F. Kennedy fue asesinado por Lee Harvey Oswald, o por otros que con éxito cometieron un golpe de Estado en Estados Unidos.
El presidente John F. Kennedy fue asesinado el 22 de noviembre de 1963 en Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas. Lee Harvey Oswald, la persona marcada como asesino de JFK fue asesinado dos días más tarde mientras estaba bajo custodia policial, por Jack Ruby, propietario del Carousel Club. Jack Ruby era amigo del pecho con una gran parte de los empleados de la policía de Dallas y tenía numerosos vínculos con el crimen organizado.

Habiendo investigado el asesinato de JFK durante años, hace mucho tiempo descubrí que hay una montaña de desinformación en existencia relacionada con este caso. Esta desinformación proviene de ambos lados de la valla, es decir, de “LNer’s” y “CTer’s”. Gran parte de esta desinformación ha sido deliberada, y algunos accidental. Ninguna de estas informaciones falsas ha beneficiado una resolución al caso de asesinato; Toda la información falsa es engañosa y paraliza cualquier comprensión de lo que ocurrió en ese día fatídico. La propia Comisión Warren presentó deliberadamente pruebas falsas relacionadas con las heridas de JFK. El FBI de Hoover retuvo pruebas y sigue haciéndolo aún hoy. La CIA continúa negándose a publicar sus registros sobre el asesinato. A los testigos se les concedió inmunidad para declarar, cuyos registros fueron sellados rápidamente. ¿Fue todo este engaño para proteger a Lee Harvey Oswald, el supuesto “asesino solitario”, y un hombre ya asesinado? No lo creo. Si Lee era tan culpable y un “asesino solitario”, ¿por qué todo este drama?

Mis tareas o metas en este capítulo son dos. La primera tarea es presentarle, el lector, pruebas basadas en hechos (incluyendo correcciones). La segunda tarea es ayudar a proporcionar una comprensión clara y precisa de esa evidencia. Si logro estos dos objetivos, no tengo ninguna duda de que lo que realmente sucedió en Dallas comenzará a ser alarmantemente claro para usted.
El presidente más joven de la historia americana fue asesinado el 22 de noviembre de 1963. . . Pero no fue Lee Harvey Oswald quien lo mató. Tres hombres murieron ese fin de semana, Kennedy, Oswald y el policía de la policía de Dallas, J.D. Tippit. Un cuarto hombre fue gravemente herido, el Gobernador John Connally. Ninguno de ellos merecía su destino.

Lee Harvey Oswald fue rápidamente calificado de “comunista”, “loco en la cabeza” y “Solitario Asesino”. Oswald fue culpado por las heridas de Kennedy, Connally y Tippit, pero esas acusaciones no son ciertas. Lamentablemente, la ex esposa de Lee (Marina Oswald), su madre Marguerite, sus dos hijas (Junio y Rachel) y su hermano (Robert) tendrían que cargar con la carga de la supuesta culpa de Lee durante 53 años.
Después de centenares y de millares de horas que examinan la evidencia, espero que lo que revelo aquí hoy se hunde adentro. Espero que finalmente los americanos comiencen a entender la profundidad del engaño que implica estos asesinatos, con una mayor percepción que siempre antes. Este no es el final de la evidencia que demuestra el marco de Oswald, es el principio.

S.R. “Dusty” Rohde

CAPÍTULO I

(Enmarcando a Lee Harvey Oswald)

La Comisión Warren fue el cuerpo investigador (del asesinato de JFK) nombrado por el presidente Lyndon Baines Johnson, encabezado por el jefe de Justicia Earl Warren. Johnson fue juramentado como presidente en el campo del amor en la fuerza aérea una, en Dallas, Tejas, poco después de JFK fue asesinado.

Howard P. Willens era uno de los tres miembros que componían el “personal de supervisión” de la WC. En el libro de Willens “La historia nos demostrará que es correcto”, declara, “fui testigo del rigor, la seriedad y la integridad con que la Comisión de Warren se acercó a su tarea” (1). A esto debo objetar. Willens también proclamó que “la crítica de nuestro trabajo está seriamente equivocada” (2). Por la definición de Willens, estoy equivocado. En mi defensa sólo puedo decir “por lo menos no engañé deliberadamente al público americano”, la Comisión Warren y el Comité Selecto de Cámara sobre Asesinatos lo hicieron. Obviamente, voy a tener que justificar esa declaración.

En cuanto a la “minuciosidad” por el WC va, sólo voy a mencionar que en la comunidad de investigación JFK, el trabajo de la Comisión Warren se conoce comúnmente como The Warren Omissions. Esto se debe principalmente a la considerable cantidad de evidencia que no se examinó, a los testigos que no fueron interrogados y así sucesivamente. La etiqueta tiene mucha validez, pero no es el área que quiero incluir en este artículo. Estoy más interesado en examinar la integridad del WC y su supuesta seriedad. En otras palabras, ¿los WC dicen la verdad, toda la verdad y nada más que la verdad? ¿El “Comité Selecto de la Cámara de Asesinatos” (HSCA)? La respuesta es no.

El personal del hospital Parkland (en Dallas) trabajó originalmente en JFK y John Connally inmediatamente después de que fueran heridos en Dealey Plaza. Varios miembros del personal de Parkland fueron llamados más adelante como testigos durante las audiencias del WC. A estos miembros del personal de Parkland se les mostraron deliberadamente imágenes falsas (con dibujos de artistas) que representaban las heridas de cabeza y espalda de JFK (3). Estas imágenes eran una colección de dibujos engañosos alegados para representar las heridas de JFK. El artista Harold “Skip” Rydberg fue comisionado por el WC para realizar su trabajo necesario (4). El artista Ida Dox fue encargado más adelante en 1978 por el HSCA para crear más representaciones del artista de las heridas de JFK. Los dibujos de Ida Dox también dan falsas representaciones de las heridas de JFK, pero en este caso, Ida Dox es responsable de cualquier representación falsa de las heridas de JFK. Esto se debe a que Ida Dox tuvo acceso a las imágenes de la autopsia JFK, radiografías y testimonios de testigos previos de las audiencias del WC; Las refería con frecuencia (5). El personal del hospital Parkland volvería a ser llamado a dar testimonios por la HSCA en 1978, sólo que esta vez, se les mostraría nuevos dibujos y fotografías alteradas que representan falsas o desaparecer las heridas.

Mi argumento es que las falsas representaciones de heridas se hicieron a través de dos interpretaciones de artistas diferentes, un artista que sabía cuando crearon las imágenes que eran falsas, y un artista que no lo hizo. El engaño no se detuvo allí sin embargo. El engaño creció de los dibujos fraudulentos a los engaños fotográficos alterados presentados a los testigos del hospital de Parkland, (en las audiencias de HSCA). Las fotos las sacudían y las confundían, lo que las imágenes mostraban, no eran las heridas al cuerpo de JFK que estos testigos vieron o recordaron.

Antes de que muestre la evidencia médica que fue mal representada y cómo, quiero que se familiarice con esta declaración hecha por Arlen Specter al personal de WC. Arlen Specter, como asesor asistente de la Comisión Warren, fue el creador de la “Teoría de la Bala Única” (6), que involucró el uso de la bala “Prístina” (7). Mientras que su teoría es errónea (demostrada en este artículo, tengo que dar crédito al Sr. Spectre por la siguiente declaración: Esta declaración fue enviada por Arlen Specter al Sr. J. Lee Rankin, “consejero general” de la Comisión Warren. Cita: “La Comisión debe determinar con certeza que no hay grandes variaciones entre las películas y los dibujos del artista, las pruebas de la Comisión 385, 386 y 388 se hicieron a partir de los recuerdos de los cirujanos de autopsia como se le dijo al artista. Puede comparar las películas y los dibujos del artista y encontrar un error significativo que pudiera afectar sustancialmente el testimonio esencial y las conclusiones de la Comisión “(8) Esta declaración del Sr. Spectre fue muy profética, porque ese” algún día “es hoy, aquí y ahora .El personal de la Comisión Warren debió haber escuchado al Sr. Spectre y yo sugeriría que el Sr. Spectre sabía que las representaciones artísticas no eran exactas y trató de advertir a la WC de su uso previsto.El Sr. Spectre estaba tratando de impedir que los miembros del WC De vergüenza futura, pero sus palabras cayeron en oídos sordos.

En el caso de Harold “Skip” Rydberg, sus dibujos de las heridas de JFK no fueron deliberadamente malinterpretados por su propio hacer. El Sr. Rydberg fue instruido por J.J. Humes en cuanto a dónde colocar las heridas en los dibujos (9). En el momento de los dibujos, Rydberg nunca había visto ninguna de las fotografías reales de las heridas o del propio cuerpo, era totalmente dependiente de J.J. Humes para dar descripciones precisas de las heridas de JFK (10). J.J. Humes, como cirujano jefe de autopsia era sin duda muy familiarizado con las heridas de JFK y sus ubicaciones. La responsabilidad por cualquier error en las representaciones del artista cae directamente en los hombros de Humes como el origen de los errores en las localizaciones de la herida. Puedes jodidamente apostar que Humes sabía mejor, él sabía dónde estaban las heridas de entrada, pero falsamente las identificó, a través de Rydberg. Lo que estoy diciendo es, en blanco, el comandante Humes con pleno conocimiento y la intención fue el creador de las localizaciones de la herida fraudulenta y la identificación. La pregunta que tenemos que hacernos es por qué Humes hacer esto? ¿Por qué Humes arriesgaría su rango y su carrera para intentar fraude? Es cierto que Humes pudo haber hecho esto por su propia voluntad, pero el riesgo de ser atrapado habría sido considerable. Esta opción, aunque es posible, no parece muy probable. La única razón plausible que puedo pensar, es que alguien más arriba de la cadena le ordenó que lo hiciera. A Humes no se le pidió que firmara un acuerdo de no divulgación, pero cometer fraude aseguraría su silencio. Otras personas involucradas en la autopsia fueron hechas para firmar acuerdos de no divulgación o le dijeron que no hablaran de la autopsia por parte de funcionarios gubernamentales. Humes sabía que estas personas no estarían hablando durante mucho tiempo. Humes también era consciente de que las imágenes de la autopsia probablemente nunca serían liberadas, ya que esto estaba en contra de sus deseos y supuestamente los del Fiscal General Robert Kennedy y la familia Kennedy. Humes no tenía ni idea de que muchos años después se formaría la HSCA para iniciar una nueva investigación sobre el asesinato de JFK o que algunas de las imágenes de la autopsia estarían disponibles. Si las imágenes no hubiesen salido de las heridas de JFK, pocas personas sabrían la verdadera extensión de las heridas de JFK o los engaños deliberados cometidos por Humes e Ida Dox durante las audiencias de WC y HSCA.

Por lo tanto, en lugar de simplemente hablar de la herida tergiversaciones y engaños, voy a mostrar a usted. Las imágenes de Rydberg son WC exhibe CE385, CE386 y CE388 (11), (12).

Las tres imágenes mostradas arriba son los dibujos de las heridas de JFK creadas por Harold Rydberg, según las descripciones de la herida que le dio J.J. Humes.

Voy a abordar los errores en la colocación de la herida en la imagen del centro (CE 386) en primer lugar, ya que esto muestra directamente las falsas representaciones de CE 385 y CE 388. Ambas heridas de entrada en CE 386 están en las posiciones equivocadas, ambas heridas son Mostrada más arriba de lo que realmente eran y esto no fue un accidente. Verificar que estas heridas están localizadas incorrectamente; Voy a referirme al testimonio dado por el segundo teniente Richard Lipsey durante las audiencias de HSCA. El teniente Lipsey estuvo presente durante la mayoría de la autopsia de JFK en el Hospital Bethesda (13). El general Wehle ordenó a Lipsey que se quedara con el cuerpo todo el tiempo. El segundo teniente Richard Lipsey fue ayudante del general Wehle, quien estaba a cargo de arreglos funerarios y eventos relacionados. La referencia del Sr. Lipsey a esta herida en particular es aquella en la que habla de una bala que entra en “la parte baja de la cabeza” y / o “en la parte superior del cuello”, pero “en la línea del pelo” y termina en la ” “. El testimonio de Lipsey puede escucharse en este enlace (14). También puede leer el testimonio de Lipsey transcrito en este enlace (15).

El Sr. Lipsey declara específicamente que la herida de entrada en la parte posterior de la cabeza de JFK estaba “en la línea del pelo”, significando donde el cabello de JFK termina en el borde inferior, en la parte posterior del cuello. También afirma que esta herida fue un “agujero redondo”. Así, mientras que el dibujo de Rydberg en CE 386 muestra la herida de entrada redonda, se coloca demasiado alto. Arlen Spector también afirma que “ninguno de los médicos del Parkland Hospital de Dallas observó el agujero en la espalda del Presidente o el pequeño agujero en la parte inferior de su cabeza” (16). No importa si el personal del hospital Parkland vio la herida de la espalda o la pequeña herida de entrada en la cabeza de JFK. Lo que importa es que aquí, Arlen Specter también se refiere a la misma herida de entrada de bala señalada por el Sr. Lipsey. Arlen Specter señaló algunas objeciones específicas relacionadas con los dibujos de Rydberg: “El dibujo de artistas preparado en Bethesda (CE No. 385 y 386) muestra un ligero ángulo de declinación. Es difícil, si no imposible, explicar un ángulo tan leve de declinación “(17). . . Refiriéndose al ángulo necesario de la trayectoria para demostrar que el tiro vino del depósito de libro escolar de Tejas (TSBD). Desde aquí, las cosas van de mal en peor. Esto se debe a que cuando Arlen Specter hizo estas observaciones, nunca había visto el cuerpo de JFK ni las fotografías de Autopsia (18). Si corregimos las localizaciones de la herida, (moviéndolas más abajo a las posiciones correctas), esto entonces disminuye el ángulo de la declinación incluso a un gran grado!

En este punto, he corregido la cabeza de JFK (entrada) localización de la herida y se puede ver cómo dramáticamente esto cambia la trayectoria de la herida (ver imagen siguiente).

Si Arlen Specter pensó que sería difícil explicar un ángulo tan bajo de declinación con las heridas en las localizaciones falsas, ¡se vuelve mucho más difícil a partir de las localizaciones corregidas! Aquí está su primera pista importante de que algo no estaba bien en la casa del engaño. Por supuesto, como ya he dicho, Arlen Specter no tenía ni idea de que las heridas reales eran inferiores a las que se mostraban en los dibujos de Rydberg, si hubiera sabido que lo habría mirado con incredulidad, sabiendo que se esperaría que probara que este disparo llegó al sexto piso De la TSBD.

(* Nota de los autores: No quiero que pienses que la trayectoria mostrada en la imagen de arriba es la trayectoria exacta, no lo es, pero está muy cerca).

La herida del cuello representada en los dibujos de Rydberg crea un problema mucho mayor que la herida en la cabeza. En primer lugar, aquí de nuevo, la herida se muestra muy por encima de la localización de la herida real. En los dibujos de Rydberg, la segunda herida se muestra realmente en el cuello de JFK, que no era. J.J. Humes tuvo que saber que esta herida no estaba en el cuello de JFK. ¿Cómo no? La única razón para mover esta herida de su ubicación real fue con el único propósito de crear una falsa trayectoria de bala hacia abajo (mostrada en CE 385) e intentar crear una trayectoria que sería una coincidencia más cercana con el francotirador del sexto piso. Al corregir la ubicación de la herida por las imágenes de la autopsia JFK, llegaríamos con una nueva trayectoria (ver imagen siguiente).

Ahora recuerde, Arlen Specter tenía dudas acerca de probar que los tiros provenían de la TSBD desde sus puntos de entrada falsos. Como se ve en la imagen anterior, el supuesto punto de entrada, por J.J. Humes estaba en el cuello. La herida real a que se refiere Humes está por debajo de la línea del hombro alrededor de una pulgada y media. Espectro sin duda tendría un tiempo mucho más difícil demostrar que los disparos fueron de la TSBD de los nuevos puntos de entrada corregidos y trayectorias resultantes, pero. . . Las cosas siguen siendo mucho, mucho peor, como si ya no son lo suficientemente malo.

Arlen Specter desarrolló la “Teoría de Bala Única”, (que una sola bala pasó a través de JFK y el Gobernador John Connally), basado en lugares de heridas ficticias y trayectorias falsas. Pero hay algo más que el señor Spectre no sabía. No sólo J.J. Humes tergiversar las localizaciones de la herida, que falsamente identificó un fragmento “Salir” herida como una herida de entrada! La supuesta herida “de entrada” presentada por J.J. Humes, no es una herida de entrada en absoluto, es una herida EXIT! Toda la teoría de la bala única y la trayectoria asociada se basa en dos heridas de salida! Gente, el SBT está a punto de arder.

¿No lo crees? Lo harás, después de ver la próxima edición de mañana …. ¡estad atentos para una sorpresa!

CITACIONES

 

Capítulo uno:

 

1. “La historia nos demostrará a la derecha”, por Howard P. Willens, página 12.

2. “La historia nos demostrará a la derecha”, por Howard P. Willens, página 12.
3. Testimonios Médicos, Comisión Warren, Vol.
4. ARRB Testimonio de James Joseph Humes, página 227,     http://assassinationofjfk.net/for-the-sake-of-historical-accuracy/

5. HSCA Testimonio de Ida Dox, página 147, http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol1/html/HSCA_Vol1_0076a.htm
6. “Teoría de bala única”, https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Single_Bullet_Theory.html
7. “Bala prístina”, (CE 399) http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0038a.htm
8. JFK Prueba documental 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=98&tab=page

9. ARRB Testimonio de James Joseph Humes, página 229, http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/humesa.htm
 

10. Declaración de Harold “Skip” Rydberg, http://assassinationofjfk.net/for-the-sake-of-historical-accuracy/
11. Dibujos de Rydberg, (CE385, CE386), https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pdf/WH16_CE_385.pdf
12. Dibujo de Rydberg, (CE388), https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pdf/WH16_CE_388.pdf

13. Lipsey Doc
14. Lipsey, Richard A., Video Testimony, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9UZz07eNMc
15. Lipsey, Richard A., HSCA Testimonio, http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/med_testimony/Lipsey_1-18-78/HSCA-Lipsey.htm
16. JFK Prueba documental 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page
17. JFK Prueba documental 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page
18. JFK Prueba documental 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page

 

Death Deception (The Framing Lee Harvey Oswald), Part VIII.

Death Deception, (The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald), Part VIII.

By S.r. “Dusty” Rohde

© February 2017

Author’s Note: (I wanted to put all of my remaining info into a single article, but as it turns out, there is just to much to share, and on different subjects. This article is necessary for what comes after, thanks…Dusty).

PART VIII:

Before I get into this part of Death Deception, I want to point out a simple fact. By legal definition, Lee Harvey Oswald is “innocent” until “proven guilty” by a court of law. This was true in 1963 and it is just as true today. The Warren Commission is not a lawful substitute for a court of law or LHO’s legal right to trial by jury. Anyone who claims Oswald is guilty of shooting President Kennedy or DPD officer J.D. Tippit is participating in “libel, slander and defamation of character”. All of these are violating Oswald’s constitutional, civil and moral rights. All of these are legally actionable offences. Recently, in a discussion in Facebook forums an individual stated that they were unaware of any fraudulent evidence, perjured testimony, etc related to these shootings. I suggested that person take the time to actually look at the evidence and read the testimonies. This individual stated they would “decline” as they weren’t interested in “biased” information. Exposing evidence, factual, fraudulent, perjured or legitimate is not bias, that is objectivity and a public service. Simply because factual evidence doesn’t fit anyone’s personal pet theory and hence is rejected, that is bias, prejudice and dishonest.

Frankly, if the evidence proved Oswald guilty, I’m perfectly fine with that. I mean, what would I care? Oswald isn’t my father, my son or brother, he is not related to me and I never met the man. So what difference would it make to me if he was in fact guilty? It wouldn’t. On the other hand, if Oswald didn’t kill JFK, then I have a very big problem with the whole outcome of the Warren Commission. If Oswald truly isn’t guilty, it means someone else was and to date, they got away with murder. If they get away with it once, who’s to say they won’t do it again, or haven’t already?

While many have tarred and feathered Oswald for 50 plus years, his guilt had never been proven (beyond reasonable doubt) in a court of law. Hell, no one has even managed to supply a motive for Oswald in over 50 years. Lyndon B. Johnson had motive, so did J. Edgar Hoover and General Edwin Walker, . . .Organized Crime members had it (Carlos Marcello, etc.), Jack Ruby had it, Fidel Castro and numerous Cubans had it, H.L. Hunt and associates had it, even the CIA had motive, just about everyone but Oswald had motive. Some “Lone Nut” fans love to state “the DPD had enough evidence in 24 hours to convict Oswald”. Even after years and years, Chief Curry of the DPD stated they didn’t have to evidence to convict Oswald. Why not?

There are three common denominators used by courts of law to determine or prove someone guilty of a crime, they are “Motive, Means and Opportunity”. As I just noted, no one could prove Oswald had any “motive” to kill JFK. The opposite was actually true, Oswald had stated he liked the Kennedy’s and he thought JFK was doing a good job. Marina Oswald stated that Lee adored JFK.

No agency was able to prove that Oswald had the “opportunity” to kill JFK. Meaning, they couldn’t place him on the sixth floor at the time of the assassination. I hear people say “Oswald was in the TSBD”! Yeah, so were about 90 other people. People might as well just say “Oswald was in Texas”, that would have about the same significance. The same people state “Oswald’s fingerprints were on the boxes of the sixth floor”. No kidding? Imagine that, Oswald has to fill his orders by taking books out of the boxes on various floors, and I’m supposed to be impressed that someone may find his fingerprints on any given box? I’d be amazed if they didn’t find his prints all over. Who is it that said the hardest part of their job was moving the boxes out of their way and then put them back in place? That would be the members of the sixth floor crew, of which Oswald was not part of. The sixth floor crew had to move all of the boxes and put them back while working on the floors of the TSBD. Wouldn’t the sixth floor crew have noticed if Oswald was casually stacking boxes to set up the sniper’s nest while they were working? They didn’t. In fact, according to Tom Aylea’s testimony members of the DPD are the ones who  added boxes to the snipers nest prior to Alyea’s taking any film and photo’s, not Oswald. (See below)

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/jfk-assassination-cameraman-followed-police-as-they-searched-for-sniper/article_9679af95-d45f-502b-b094-2a09bc29c16f.html

Also per Aleya’s testimony, Captain Will Fritz picked up the shell casings near the snipers nest, pocketed them, and later officer Studebaker put them back, all prior to being photographed or filmed. In doing so, they contaminated the crime scene. The chain of evidence pertaining to the shell casings would also be broken by Lt. Day after the fact. Lt. Day testified he placed the three shell casings in an envelope (which he didn’t seal) and gave them to Detective Sims. The envelope was later returned (by whom is unknown) with only two of the shell casings, according to Lt. Day. (See the following two images below)

Now this may seem a technicality, but in a court of law, maintaining the chain of evidence is a critical point. Clearly, the chain of evidence in the case of the rifle shells was broken and the evidence contaminated when the shells were picked up prior to being photographed. This is where things take a rather odd turn at a critical juncture. So, let me contest one of the more common claims pertaining to Lee Harvey Oswald.

1)         Oswald’s fingerprints were on the rifle.

Fact #1: Lt. Day of the DPD dusted the MC rifle for fingerprints in front of multiple DPD officers, Sheriff’s officers and reporters from the media which included filming Lt. Day checking the rifle for fingerprints. Lt. Day placed protective cellophane over the fingerprints he found on the rifle, (the alleged “partial palm print” of Oswald was not one of these). Lt. Day was ordered to turn over all evidence related to the rifle and shells to the FBI lab.

Fact #2: The rifle was sent to the FBI lab, and again checked for prints, the FBI also failed to find any fingerprints of value, meaning Oswald’s or anyone else’s. The FBI also found no evidence of the alleged “partial palm print” of Oswald claimed by Lt. Day. The FBI immediately questioned why Lt. Day placed no protective cellophane over the alleged partial palm print (if it existed); as Lt. Day stated the palm print was still visible after he allegedly “lifted” the print and the best bet for the FBI to make a lift of the print to ID Oswald. This caused the FBI and the HSCA to be suspicious of Lt. Days claims. (See below)

Fact #3: The rifle was returned to the DPD by the FBI. Only after the rifle was returned did Lt. Day send two DPD officers to the morgue to fingerprint Oswald, using two different fingerprinting methods. Lt. Day magically and suddenly discovers the “faint” partial print alleged to be Oswald’s, only “after” the DPD officers lifted Oswald’s prints at the morgue (the partial print previously unprotected and unreported to the FBI and unseen by them). Could this partial print of Oswald have come directly from those made at the morgue? Would this have to be proven in a court of law (it would if I was the defense attorney)? Why would Lt. Day send officers to fingerprint Oswald at the morgue, when they had already fingerprinted him (three times) when he was still alive? Why use two differing methods to fingerprint Oswald at the morgue? (Make note that in the previous image, Lt. Day states he was going to attempt to “photograph” the alleged partial palm print he found).

There is a more important and fairly rare bit of evidence that makes the magical appearance of the alleged partial print of Oswald’s even more interesting. When the HSCA requested the “original” partial print from NARA, the Warren Commission, the FBI and the Dallas Police Department, none of these agencies could produce it, it magically disappeared, as if it never existed. (See below)

The only evidence anyone had that the print existed was Lt. Days claim and a “photograph” he submitted as evidence which as stated, was sent on the 26th of November. However, make note the date on the previous image. The memorandum was sent on the 29th, indicating the FBI still had not received the original prints or any others from the time of Oswald’s arrest. (See also the following link, pages 2,3,4,5 and 6)

http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/1344/rec/42

Also make note of the following testimonies related from the FBI and the HSCA during the HSCA hearings.

   

(NARS = NARA where shown in above image)

So if you put this all together, what does it mean?

 

• Day put no protective cellophane over the alleged partial print of Oswald prior to sending the rifle and related material to the FBI. (Even though Lt. Day claimed this partial print had the most value or potential to ID Oswald)
• Day made no mention of the alleged partial print to the FBI when he turned the evidence over to the FBI.
• The FBI found zero evidence of the alleged partial print that Lt. Day claimed still existed after he lifted the print.
• Day never sent the original partial print to the FBI as he claimed.
• During the HSCA hearings, no one could produce the original alleged partial print of Oswald, not the HSCA, the Warren Commission, NARA, the FBI or the Dallas Police.
• No other prints were determined to be of any value in identifying anyone who may have handled the rifle.
• Day only claimed to find the partial print “after” having Oswald fingerprinted twice at the morgue.
• The FBI and the HSCA were suspicious of Lt. Days claim, (meaning suspecting he may have fabricated this evidence).
• Oswald’s prints were not on the rifle.
• With no fingerprints connecting Oswald to the rifle means no one can prove Oswald had the “means” to commit the crime.Even if the original partial print was somehow magically found, after everyone else failed to find it, Prosecutors would still have to prove Lt. Day didn’t fabricate the evidence. They would have to convince a jury, not a court of public opinion. What I’ve shown doesn’t include any of the other evidence already presented in these articles. This also doesn’t include any information or evidence that Oswald may have presented to his defense attorneys had he lived to testify. Add to this information any and all other evidence that is provable as being fraudulent, incorrect, manipulated….or that was suppressed or that vanished from the records. The prosecution has to prove guilt “beyond reasonable doubt”. The defense attorney’s job is to create that reasonable doubt, if they couldn’t prove Oswald innocent outright (and I’m not saying they wouldn’t have been able to prove Oswald innocent).The big question anyone should ask themselves is, did the DPD have any motive in wanting to see Oswald found guilty. Did anyone in the DPD have motive to fabricate evidence? Well, considering one of their own was murdered and Oswald was considered the prime suspect, I would have to say yes. Then include the fact that Oswald allegedly attacked Officer McDonald. I think certain members of the DPD might just have taken that a bit personally.

  While on the subject of proving if Oswald had the “means” to shoot JFK, we need to examine another bit of information researchers and investigators overlook.  The 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano rifle allegedly purchased by Alek Hiddell (aka Lee Harvey Oswald) was indeed found on the sixth floor of the TSBD. This purchase in March 1963 (8 months prior to the assassination) was the alleged proof that Oswald was the assassin (along with the alleged partial print no one can find). Bear in mind that the burden of proof falls upon the prosecution, and not the defendant. So let me bring up a point of interest. (See below)

  

  Whether this story was true or not, I can’t say. Whether or not the WC investigated this story I don’t know. True or not, this story does raise a key point. Even potentially proving with 100 % certainty that Oswald purchased the MC rifle in March doesn’t prove Oswald still owned that rifle on the 22^nd of November. Proving this would be kind of important, don’t you think?

  According to the previous testimony, the rifle wasn’t won by Oswald while gambling (In August), prior to the assassination. Is this why police found no spare ammunition in Oswald’s possession? Can anyone prove to me that there was a single witness who saw the rifle in the home of Ruth Paine on the 21^st of November, or the 20^th, the 19^th, no? How about a week or a month before? Can anyone prove to me the exact date the last time the rifle was actually seen in the garage of the Paine home? Marina Oswald stated the last time she had seen the rifle was two to three weeks prior to the assassination. Marina also said she didn’t see the whole rifle, just part of the barrel. Why does this matter? Any defense attorney worth a damn would ask the same question in a court of law and because the prosecution would have to prove Oswald still owned the rifle.

  If prosecutors fail to prove Oswald had the “motive, means” (owning the rifle on 21^st or 22^nd November and no prints of LHO on the rifle) or opportunity to kill JFK means no one can convict him.  I’ll grant that what I’ve presented hear could be declared as “technicalities” that could prove Oswald innocent, even if he had fired a shot. Just the same, it is important that you understand the information that has been presented to you in this article. This information is laying the foundation for some very surprising information coming in the next article. On that note, let me provide a sample of what is coming in that next article.

  The big question is can Oswald be proven innocent beyond these technicalities?

  Let’s have a look at the next bit of interesting evidence.  Anyone familiar with the history of the assassination is aware that several witnesses testified there was a Secret Service agent (fake) on the grassy knoll who was blocking people from going behind the picket fence. This is something that is never looked at with any depth on JFK research forums.

   

  • If “Oswald acted alone”, then explain the fake Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll.

   

  What you may not know, is that Oswald was reported as having met with an FBI agent using Secret Service credentials while at work, and prior to the assassination. (See below).

  “Alba always ate his lunch at Jack MANCUSO ‘ s restaurant and he saw OSWALD there many times but usually alone as he can’t remember anyone with him. (NOTE: Guy BANISTER office was just behind the restaurant in the same building). During this period of time the Secret Service stored their cars, as well as vehicles that were seized by them at ALBA’s garage.

  One particular day, he remembers it because it was rather unusual and his memory was jogged by a TV commercial being shown just a couple of years ago, a FBI man came down, showed ALBA his credentials and also showed him a pass issued by the Secret Service allowing this FBI man to take out what he recalls as light green Plymouth. The car was kept out, apparently by this agent for two or three days. During this time he (Alba) was standing outside of his garage and he saw, as he referred to it, ‘my car’ coming down the street. He saw the plate number so it was the same one. The car stopped at the corner just outside of the Reilly Coffee company and he saw OSWALD come out of the building, go over to the car, not hold a conversation of any duration, but take a legal sized envelope hold it to his stomach under his T-shirt, turn around in a crouched position, and go back into the building straightening up as he went. The thing that jogged his memory was the commercial of a businessman (Rosenberg) showing a similar action. HE STATES THAT HE HAS NOT MENTIONED THIS IN THE PAST. ALBA has the record books going back to that time and an attempt was made to ascertain the license plate number and the agent assigned to the vehicle. The records that were checked by Daly and Buras only showed three of the five or six that were stored there and none were the vehicle in question. Further efforts will be made in this direction.” (See link below).

  http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/32045/rec/5

This is a rather strange set of circumstances is it not, a fake Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll, and an FBI agent using Secret Service credentials meeting with Oswald? This may or may not have been the same Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll on the day of the assassination, but it could be a vital bit of information. Obviously, if this was the same
“fake” Secret Service agent, then Lee was obviously not “acting alone”.

Author’s Note: (In the next article it is time to identify those involved with the assassination and to provide evidence well beyone that…until next time).

 

 

 

 

THE DALLAS ACTION #101~ “BLOWBACK~Part Two: Cubans, Contras, Dope & Money.”

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW PT.101 IS UP NOW! CLICK HERE TO LISTEN/DOWNLOAD: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/101-january-7-2017-blowback-part-two-cub

   IN THIS EPISODE~ in Part Two of the “BLOWBACK” series(Ted Rubinstein will be back in two weeks for Part Three),  we move forward in time to 1985 to relate some very useful background info tht will help us put all this stuff into a proper context: The story of a retired career Military Intelligence who came forward with an astounding array of allegations. And his information not only led to the expusure of the Iran/Contra Network, but threatened to expose an alleged secret, shadow network of retired Intelligence Officers up to no good, and as he claimed, were involved in the Dallas action.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION.