The Pristine Bullet

The Pristine Bullet

(Update and Amendment to Death Deception, The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald)

By S.r. “Dusty” Rohde

©March, 2017

In previous articles I published under the title “Death Deception, The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald”, I demonstrated the impossibility of the “Pristine” bullet and the fact that this bullet could not have and did not touch President John F. Kennedy.

At the time of writing the previous articles, I had been aware of certain events but did not mention them. So, now, in light of recently discovered information, I can expose the necessity of this pristine bullet.

First of all, one of the purposes of the pristine bullet was window dressing. By that I mean, this bullet, being in near perfect condition was readily identifiable as a 6.5mm round. The same type of round used in the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle allegedly owned by Oswald. So this round was alleged to be from Oswald’s rifle in testimonies, prior to testing.

I need to remind everyone that based upon the evidence, the pristine bullet was not even a possibility based upon current evidence. Not only did this bullet never touch JFK, it never passed through John Connally either.

Also in previous articles I noted the fraud and perjury committed by J.J. Humes, chief autopsy surgeon at Bethesda. One of Humes many claims were that they were unable to find the bullet that had entered JFK’s back. Without this bullet, there could be no Neutron Activation test on this bullet; A test that would confirm whether or not the bullets hitting JFK and John Connally were in fact similar bullets (same chemical makeup, manufacturers, etc.) or entirely different. Neutron activation tests basically allow forensic experts to determine the mineral make up of various materials with great precision. This is done by the use of radiation on the material (in this case, a bullet) and the resulting Gamma rays are measured. By this method, it is easily determined if bullet’s are from the same weapon. (See link below)

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00450616809410284?journalCode=tajf20

While Humes and other surgeons allegedly couldn’t find the bullet that entered JFK’s back, they are saved. By the mercy of the heavens and the miraculous FBI agents, they discover the pristine bullet in the greatest hour of need! Now, J.J. Humes has the sudden discovery of the frontal neck wound and that this “magic” bullet must have struck both JFK and John Connally. By a sheer stroke of luck, they now have a bullet that they can do the Neutron Activation test with! The test will be between the fragments from John Connally’s wrist and the pristine bullet of the Single bullet theory. (See below)

(Above quote referring to the Connally fragments and pristine bullet)

The suggestion has often been made that this pristine bullet was planted, possibly by Jack Ruby himself. Most people know that this bullet was allegedly found on a stretcher by Parkland Hospital staff. Yet, there was no chain of evidence related to this bullet and considerable evidence that this bullet was not the same bullet found on the stretcher to begin with. So to understand that evidence, please read the material found at the following link. This is an excellent piece of work by Gary Aquilar and Josiah Thompson. (See below)

https://www.history-matters.com/essays/frameup/EvenMoreMagical/EvenMoreMagical.htm

According to the interview given by Tom Alyea, (former reporter who filmed the discovery of the MC rifle on the sixth floor), Tom stated “A round was still in the gun’s chamber, ready to fire, with two more bullets in the ammunition clip”.     (See link below)

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/jfk-assassination-cameraman-followed-police-as-they-searched-for-sniper/article_9679af95-d45f-502b-b094-2a09bc29c16f.html

The fact that there was a live round found in the chamber of the rifle described by Tom Alyea agrees with evidence stated by the DPD. (See image below)

This then would mean there were a total of six rounds found (three live rounds and three empty shell casings), which is precisely how many rounds the clip for the MC rifle holds at one time. Normally, I think most people might be under the impression that only one live round was discovered, and three empty shells. This is because of the evidence that the DPD says they had. Note that in the article by Tom Alyea, he alludes to the “lies” told by DPD officers in their testimonies. Although I know there is a photo floating around that also shows a live round in the clip (still have to track it down). There is however no mention of these two additional live rounds in testimonies, at least not that I’m yet aware of.

The question that needs to be asked is, if the pristine bullet wasn’t fired at JFK or John Connally, where did it come from? Tom Alyea stated two live rounds were in the clip, and now those two rounds are unaccounted for.

Let me ask you a question. If you substitute one of the bullets from the live rounds that were in the clip, for the bullet found on the stretcher (if there ever was a bullet on the stretcher), what happens? Do you suddenly have a bullet that defies all known physics, striking JFK and Connally? Do you now have a bullet that the Neutron Activation test can be done on? Will not that NA test prove beyond doubt that the pristine bullet is a match from the MC rifle, since after all it was taken from the clip in the rifle? Will not that evidence cement the Single Bullet Theory? Why do the NA test between the bullet that hit John Connally and this pristine bullet? Why not do the NA test against the bullet fragments that hit JFK and fragments from Connally? What are they afraid of?

I have demonstrated in previous articles that one and only one bullet hit a target from the TSBD, the bullet that hit John Connally. Do you see what is going on here? There never was any test done between the bullets that hit JFK and the bullets that hit Connally, this was all smoke and mirrors! All of this was just an elaborate deception in the grand scheme of framing Lee Harvey Oswald. The pristine bullet was allegedly “found” even before the autopsy was completed. This substitute bullet virtually quaranteed a match between it and the bullet that hit Conally in the NA test! This planted bullet so crucial to linking the MC rifle to Oswald as the lone assassin was nothign more then a cover-up and frame-up, hand in hand.

THE DALLAS ACTION #104~ February 25, 2017: “Critical Thought & Analysis: Vetting Witnesses”, With Larry Hancock.

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW #104 HAS UPLOADED. CLICK THIS LINK TO LISTEN/DOWNLOAD FREE: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/104-february-25-2017-critical-thought-an

   IN THIS EPISODE~ Author, Researcher and Political Assassinations Scholar Larry Hancock is BACK on the show! He shares with us his 2017 “November In Dallas” LANCER Powerepoint presentation for use in our own private study-group “analysis workshop”. Mr. Larry has worked up a system for, as he calls it, “separating the wheat from the chaff”, specific points/questions/criteria that, when applied to witness statements & stories, can help you better determine which witnesses are worthy of further consideration and which ones are probably a waste of time and not worth further consideration.

   So, we’re going to apply these criteria to several witnesses/characters in the narrative, including Fred Crisman, E. Howard Hunt, Thomas Beckham, Loran Hall, Gene Wheaton, Gerry Hemming and others. We’ll also apply the criteria to ME, and my personal experience as an accidental witness to a murder 13 years ago.

  THIS is a fun, informative and most of all INSTRUCTIONAL conversation. JOIN IN!

THE DALLAS ACTION #103~ February 11, 2017 “Guarding The Gates: Harold Weisberg And The Gunboat Cowboys.”

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW EPISODE #103 IS UP! CLICKTHIS LINK TO PLAY/DOWNLOAD: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/103-february-11-2017-guarding-the-gates-

   IN THIS EPISODE~ One need only study the JFK Assassination for a short amount of time to learn the name Harold Weisberg. It can be argued that Weisberg was~along with Mark Lane~ one of the original Warren Report Critics, publishing the 1st of his 5-volume book series on the Assassination, “Whitewash”, in 1965. Weisberg spent decades investigating Dallas and later donated to Hood College the largest private collection of JFK Assassination research materials in the world, the Legendary Weisberg Archive.

   …and it is from that archive that this story comes. Buried deep in the collection of Weisberg’s own personal corrospondence is the fascinating story of Weisberg’s relationship to anti-Castro mercenary, narcotics & gun-runner and Dealey Plaza Hit Team Suspect Loran E. Hall. A decade-plus-long relationship that saw Weisberg actively & willingly running interference on Hall’s behalf, from Garrison to the HSCA, and we find a  SHOCKING confession~by Weisberg’s Own Hand~ of the commission of a Criminal Act. A criminal act surrounding evidence in the Assassination itself.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION.

Death Deception (The Framing Lee Harvey Oswald), Part VIII.

Death Deception, (The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald), Part VIII.

By S.r. “Dusty” Rohde

© February 2017

Author’s Note: (I wanted to put all of my remaining info into a single article, but as it turns out, there is just to much to share, and on different subjects. This article is necessary for what comes after, thanks…Dusty).

PART VIII:

Before I get into this part of Death Deception, I want to point out a simple fact. By legal definition, Lee Harvey Oswald is “innocent” until “proven guilty” by a court of law. This was true in 1963 and it is just as true today. The Warren Commission is not a lawful substitute for a court of law or LHO’s legal right to trial by jury. Anyone who claims Oswald is guilty of shooting President Kennedy or DPD officer J.D. Tippit is participating in “libel, slander and defamation of character”. All of these are violating Oswald’s constitutional, civil and moral rights. All of these are legally actionable offences. Recently, in a discussion in Facebook forums an individual stated that they were unaware of any fraudulent evidence, perjured testimony, etc related to these shootings. I suggested that person take the time to actually look at the evidence and read the testimonies. This individual stated they would “decline” as they weren’t interested in “biased” information. Exposing evidence, factual, fraudulent, perjured or legitimate is not bias, that is objectivity and a public service. Simply because factual evidence doesn’t fit anyone’s personal pet theory and hence is rejected, that is bias, prejudice and dishonest.

Frankly, if the evidence proved Oswald guilty, I’m perfectly fine with that. I mean, what would I care? Oswald isn’t my father, my son or brother, he is not related to me and I never met the man. So what difference would it make to me if he was in fact guilty? It wouldn’t. On the other hand, if Oswald didn’t kill JFK, then I have a very big problem with the whole outcome of the Warren Commission. If Oswald truly isn’t guilty, it means someone else was and to date, they got away with murder. If they get away with it once, who’s to say they won’t do it again, or haven’t already?

While many have tarred and feathered Oswald for 50 plus years, his guilt had never been proven (beyond reasonable doubt) in a court of law. Hell, no one has even managed to supply a motive for Oswald in over 50 years. Lyndon B. Johnson had motive, so did J. Edgar Hoover and General Edwin Walker, . . .Organized Crime members had it (Carlos Marcello, etc.), Jack Ruby had it, Fidel Castro and numerous Cubans had it, H.L. Hunt and associates had it, even the CIA had motive, just about everyone but Oswald had motive. Some “Lone Nut” fans love to state “the DPD had enough evidence in 24 hours to convict Oswald”. Even after years and years, Chief Curry of the DPD stated they didn’t have to evidence to convict Oswald. Why not?

There are three common denominators used by courts of law to determine or prove someone guilty of a crime, they are “Motive, Means and Opportunity”. As I just noted, no one could prove Oswald had any “motive” to kill JFK. The opposite was actually true, Oswald had stated he liked the Kennedy’s and he thought JFK was doing a good job. Marina Oswald stated that Lee adored JFK.

No agency was able to prove that Oswald had the “opportunity” to kill JFK. Meaning, they couldn’t place him on the sixth floor at the time of the assassination. I hear people say “Oswald was in the TSBD”! Yeah, so were about 90 other people. People might as well just say “Oswald was in Texas”, that would have about the same significance. The same people state “Oswald’s fingerprints were on the boxes of the sixth floor”. No kidding? Imagine that, Oswald has to fill his orders by taking books out of the boxes on various floors, and I’m supposed to be impressed that someone may find his fingerprints on any given box? I’d be amazed if they didn’t find his prints all over. Who is it that said the hardest part of their job was moving the boxes out of their way and then put them back in place? That would be the members of the sixth floor crew, of which Oswald was not part of. The sixth floor crew had to move all of the boxes and put them back while working on the floors of the TSBD. Wouldn’t the sixth floor crew have noticed if Oswald was casually stacking boxes to set up the sniper’s nest while they were working? They didn’t. In fact, according to Tom Aylea’s testimony members of the DPD are the ones who  added boxes to the snipers nest prior to Alyea’s taking any film and photo’s, not Oswald. (See below)

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/jfk-assassination-cameraman-followed-police-as-they-searched-for-sniper/article_9679af95-d45f-502b-b094-2a09bc29c16f.html

Also per Aleya’s testimony, Captain Will Fritz picked up the shell casings near the snipers nest, pocketed them, and later officer Studebaker put them back, all prior to being photographed or filmed. In doing so, they contaminated the crime scene. The chain of evidence pertaining to the shell casings would also be broken by Lt. Day after the fact. Lt. Day testified he placed the three shell casings in an envelope (which he didn’t seal) and gave them to Detective Sims. The envelope was later returned (by whom is unknown) with only two of the shell casings, according to Lt. Day. (See the following two images below)

Now this may seem a technicality, but in a court of law, maintaining the chain of evidence is a critical point. Clearly, the chain of evidence in the case of the rifle shells was broken and the evidence contaminated when the shells were picked up prior to being photographed. This is where things take a rather odd turn at a critical juncture. So, let me contest one of the more common claims pertaining to Lee Harvey Oswald.

1)         Oswald’s fingerprints were on the rifle.

Fact #1: Lt. Day of the DPD dusted the MC rifle for fingerprints in front of multiple DPD officers, Sheriff’s officers and reporters from the media which included filming Lt. Day checking the rifle for fingerprints. Lt. Day placed protective cellophane over the fingerprints he found on the rifle, (the alleged “partial palm print” of Oswald was not one of these). Lt. Day was ordered to turn over all evidence related to the rifle and shells to the FBI lab.

Fact #2: The rifle was sent to the FBI lab, and again checked for prints, the FBI also failed to find any fingerprints of value, meaning Oswald’s or anyone else’s. The FBI also found no evidence of the alleged “partial palm print” of Oswald claimed by Lt. Day. The FBI immediately questioned why Lt. Day placed no protective cellophane over the alleged partial palm print (if it existed); as Lt. Day stated the palm print was still visible after he allegedly “lifted” the print and the best bet for the FBI to make a lift of the print to ID Oswald. This caused the FBI and the HSCA to be suspicious of Lt. Days claims. (See below)

Fact #3: The rifle was returned to the DPD by the FBI. Only after the rifle was returned did Lt. Day send two DPD officers to the morgue to fingerprint Oswald, using two different fingerprinting methods. Lt. Day magically and suddenly discovers the “faint” partial print alleged to be Oswald’s, only “after” the DPD officers lifted Oswald’s prints at the morgue (the partial print previously unprotected and unreported to the FBI and unseen by them). Could this partial print of Oswald have come directly from those made at the morgue? Would this have to be proven in a court of law (it would if I was the defense attorney)? Why would Lt. Day send officers to fingerprint Oswald at the morgue, when they had already fingerprinted him (three times) when he was still alive? Why use two differing methods to fingerprint Oswald at the morgue? (Make note that in the previous image, Lt. Day states he was going to attempt to “photograph” the alleged partial palm print he found).

There is a more important and fairly rare bit of evidence that makes the magical appearance of the alleged partial print of Oswald’s even more interesting. When the HSCA requested the “original” partial print from NARA, the Warren Commission, the FBI and the Dallas Police Department, none of these agencies could produce it, it magically disappeared, as if it never existed. (See below)

The only evidence anyone had that the print existed was Lt. Days claim and a “photograph” he submitted as evidence which as stated, was sent on the 26th of November. However, make note the date on the previous image. The memorandum was sent on the 29th, indicating the FBI still had not received the original prints or any others from the time of Oswald’s arrest. (See also the following link, pages 2,3,4,5 and 6)

http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/1344/rec/42

Also make note of the following testimonies related from the FBI and the HSCA during the HSCA hearings.

   

(NARS = NARA where shown in above image)

So if you put this all together, what does it mean?

 

• Day put no protective cellophane over the alleged partial print of Oswald prior to sending the rifle and related material to the FBI. (Even though Lt. Day claimed this partial print had the most value or potential to ID Oswald)
• Day made no mention of the alleged partial print to the FBI when he turned the evidence over to the FBI.
• The FBI found zero evidence of the alleged partial print that Lt. Day claimed still existed after he lifted the print.
• Day never sent the original partial print to the FBI as he claimed.
• During the HSCA hearings, no one could produce the original alleged partial print of Oswald, not the HSCA, the Warren Commission, NARA, the FBI or the Dallas Police.
• No other prints were determined to be of any value in identifying anyone who may have handled the rifle.
• Day only claimed to find the partial print “after” having Oswald fingerprinted twice at the morgue.
• The FBI and the HSCA were suspicious of Lt. Days claim, (meaning suspecting he may have fabricated this evidence).
• Oswald’s prints were not on the rifle.
• With no fingerprints connecting Oswald to the rifle means no one can prove Oswald had the “means” to commit the crime.Even if the original partial print was somehow magically found, after everyone else failed to find it, Prosecutors would still have to prove Lt. Day didn’t fabricate the evidence. They would have to convince a jury, not a court of public opinion. What I’ve shown doesn’t include any of the other evidence already presented in these articles. This also doesn’t include any information or evidence that Oswald may have presented to his defense attorneys had he lived to testify. Add to this information any and all other evidence that is provable as being fraudulent, incorrect, manipulated….or that was suppressed or that vanished from the records. The prosecution has to prove guilt “beyond reasonable doubt”. The defense attorney’s job is to create that reasonable doubt, if they couldn’t prove Oswald innocent outright (and I’m not saying they wouldn’t have been able to prove Oswald innocent).The big question anyone should ask themselves is, did the DPD have any motive in wanting to see Oswald found guilty. Did anyone in the DPD have motive to fabricate evidence? Well, considering one of their own was murdered and Oswald was considered the prime suspect, I would have to say yes. Then include the fact that Oswald allegedly attacked Officer McDonald. I think certain members of the DPD might just have taken that a bit personally.

  While on the subject of proving if Oswald had the “means” to shoot JFK, we need to examine another bit of information researchers and investigators overlook.  The 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano rifle allegedly purchased by Alek Hiddell (aka Lee Harvey Oswald) was indeed found on the sixth floor of the TSBD. This purchase in March 1963 (8 months prior to the assassination) was the alleged proof that Oswald was the assassin (along with the alleged partial print no one can find). Bear in mind that the burden of proof falls upon the prosecution, and not the defendant. So let me bring up a point of interest. (See below)

  

  Whether this story was true or not, I can’t say. Whether or not the WC investigated this story I don’t know. True or not, this story does raise a key point. Even potentially proving with 100 % certainty that Oswald purchased the MC rifle in March doesn’t prove Oswald still owned that rifle on the 22^nd of November. Proving this would be kind of important, don’t you think?

  According to the previous testimony, the rifle wasn’t won by Oswald while gambling (In August), prior to the assassination. Is this why police found no spare ammunition in Oswald’s possession? Can anyone prove to me that there was a single witness who saw the rifle in the home of Ruth Paine on the 21^st of November, or the 20^th, the 19^th, no? How about a week or a month before? Can anyone prove to me the exact date the last time the rifle was actually seen in the garage of the Paine home? Marina Oswald stated the last time she had seen the rifle was two to three weeks prior to the assassination. Marina also said she didn’t see the whole rifle, just part of the barrel. Why does this matter? Any defense attorney worth a damn would ask the same question in a court of law and because the prosecution would have to prove Oswald still owned the rifle.

  If prosecutors fail to prove Oswald had the “motive, means” (owning the rifle on 21^st or 22^nd November and no prints of LHO on the rifle) or opportunity to kill JFK means no one can convict him.  I’ll grant that what I’ve presented hear could be declared as “technicalities” that could prove Oswald innocent, even if he had fired a shot. Just the same, it is important that you understand the information that has been presented to you in this article. This information is laying the foundation for some very surprising information coming in the next article. On that note, let me provide a sample of what is coming in that next article.

  The big question is can Oswald be proven innocent beyond these technicalities?

  Let’s have a look at the next bit of interesting evidence.  Anyone familiar with the history of the assassination is aware that several witnesses testified there was a Secret Service agent (fake) on the grassy knoll who was blocking people from going behind the picket fence. This is something that is never looked at with any depth on JFK research forums.

   

  • If “Oswald acted alone”, then explain the fake Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll.

   

  What you may not know, is that Oswald was reported as having met with an FBI agent using Secret Service credentials while at work, and prior to the assassination. (See below).

  “Alba always ate his lunch at Jack MANCUSO ‘ s restaurant and he saw OSWALD there many times but usually alone as he can’t remember anyone with him. (NOTE: Guy BANISTER office was just behind the restaurant in the same building). During this period of time the Secret Service stored their cars, as well as vehicles that were seized by them at ALBA’s garage.

  One particular day, he remembers it because it was rather unusual and his memory was jogged by a TV commercial being shown just a couple of years ago, a FBI man came down, showed ALBA his credentials and also showed him a pass issued by the Secret Service allowing this FBI man to take out what he recalls as light green Plymouth. The car was kept out, apparently by this agent for two or three days. During this time he (Alba) was standing outside of his garage and he saw, as he referred to it, ‘my car’ coming down the street. He saw the plate number so it was the same one. The car stopped at the corner just outside of the Reilly Coffee company and he saw OSWALD come out of the building, go over to the car, not hold a conversation of any duration, but take a legal sized envelope hold it to his stomach under his T-shirt, turn around in a crouched position, and go back into the building straightening up as he went. The thing that jogged his memory was the commercial of a businessman (Rosenberg) showing a similar action. HE STATES THAT HE HAS NOT MENTIONED THIS IN THE PAST. ALBA has the record books going back to that time and an attempt was made to ascertain the license plate number and the agent assigned to the vehicle. The records that were checked by Daly and Buras only showed three of the five or six that were stored there and none were the vehicle in question. Further efforts will be made in this direction.” (See link below).

  http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/32045/rec/5

This is a rather strange set of circumstances is it not, a fake Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll, and an FBI agent using Secret Service credentials meeting with Oswald? This may or may not have been the same Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll on the day of the assassination, but it could be a vital bit of information. Obviously, if this was the same
“fake” Secret Service agent, then Lee was obviously not “acting alone”.

Author’s Note: (In the next article it is time to identify those involved with the assassination and to provide evidence well beyone that…until next time).

 

 

 

 

THE DALLAS ACTION #102 ~ January 21, 2017: “BLOWBACK~Part Three: AM/TRUNK And The Secret Team”, with Ted Rubinstein.

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW #102 IS UP! https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/102-january-21-2017-blowback-part-three-

IN THIS EPISODE~we’re BACK with our friend Ted Rubinstein, who is going to lay out for the individuals and connections of the super-secret network of shadowy intelligence operatives that thrived for decades. Connections that not only reach back to Kennedy-sanctioned-and-led anti-Castro operations, but reach forward to illegal narcotics & gun trafficking in the Middle East and other political assassinations committed on US soil, and may very well have bearing on the truth of the JFK Hit.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION.

THE DALLAS ACTION #101~ “BLOWBACK~Part Two: Cubans, Contras, Dope & Money.”

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW PT.101 IS UP NOW! CLICK HERE TO LISTEN/DOWNLOAD: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/101-january-7-2017-blowback-part-two-cub

   IN THIS EPISODE~ in Part Two of the “BLOWBACK” series(Ted Rubinstein will be back in two weeks for Part Three),  we move forward in time to 1985 to relate some very useful background info tht will help us put all this stuff into a proper context: The story of a retired career Military Intelligence who came forward with an astounding array of allegations. And his information not only led to the expusure of the Iran/Contra Network, but threatened to expose an alleged secret, shadow network of retired Intelligence Officers up to no good, and as he claimed, were involved in the Dallas action.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION.

THE DALLAS ACTION ~ PT.100, December 26, 2016: “Bad Craziness At No Name Key: LIFE Magazine, INTERPEN, And The Hit Team Talent Pool.”

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW “The Dallas Action” PART 100 IS UP! CLICK THIS LINK TO LISTEN/DOWNLOAD!: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/100-december-26-2016-bad-craziness-at-no

   IN THIS EPISODE~ A number of things on the agenda:

*We’ll take a few minutes to get the audience cuaght up on some behind-the-scenes stuff going on during our “short, unplanned hiatus”;

*Introduce our New Presenting Sponsor, Wall Street Window, and announce a couple of cool changes to the podcast for 2017;

*…and of course, we’ll get into some new Study Material: 

   In 1967~in the midst of the Garrison Investigation~an adventurer/journalist named Tom Dunkin was prompted to write a detailed memorandum concerning his time spent living, drinking & training in the Florida Keys with INTERPEN during 1962-63, a memo delivered to a LIFE editor with his own pre-assassination ties to the militant anti-Castro operations of the early ’60’s, along with the Zapruder Film, Frank Sturgis~and later, if you can believe it~the House Select Committee On Assassinations. It’s a fascinating story.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION!