Deception de la Mort, Encadrement Lee Harvey Oswald

Deception de la Mort, Encadrement Lee Harvey Oswald

Écrit par S.r. Dusty Rohde

©Novembre, 2016

REMERCIEMENTS:

J’aimerais remercier tout particulièrement Gayle Nix-Jackson, Michael Doherty et Ted Rubenstein, qui ont contribué à déclencher les chemins qui ont mené aux découvertes dans les prochains articles. En outre, un remerciement particulier à Linda Giovanna Zambanini pour l’écoute et l’aide constante avec mes demandes.

PROLOGUE
Pendant 53 ans, une bataille a fait rage entre deux groupes. Les groupes sont les «Lone Nutters» (LNer’s) et les «Conspiracy Theorists» (CTer’s). Ces deux groupes ont des points de vue opposés sur la question de savoir si le président John F. Kennedy a été assassiné par Lee Harvey Oswald, ou par d’autres qui ont réussi à commettre un coup d’État en Amérique.
Le président John F. Kennedy a été assassiné le 22 novembre 1963 à Dealey Plaza, à Dallas, au Texas. Lee Harvey Oswald, la personne marquée comme l’assassin de JFK a été lui-même assassiné deux jours plus tard, alors qu’il était en garde à vue par le propriétaire du Carousel Club, Jack Ruby. Jack Ruby était copains avec une grande partie des employés de la police de Dallas et avait de nombreux liens avec le crime organisé.

Après avoir étudié l’assassinat JFK depuis des années, j’ai découvert il ya longtemps une montagne de désinformation en existence liée à ce cas. Cette désinformation vient des deux côtés de la clôture, c’est-à-dire de «LNer» et «CTer». Une grande partie de cette désinformation a été délibérée, et certains accidentels. Aucune de ces fausses informations n’a bénéficié d’une résolution à l’affaire d’assassinat; Toutes les fausses informations sont trompeuses et paralysent toute compréhension de ce qui s’est passé ce jour fatidique. La Commission Warren elle-même a délibérément présenté de fausses preuves relatives aux blessures de JFK. Le FBI de Hoover a retenu des preuves et continue de le faire encore aujourd’hui. La CIA continue de refuser la publication de leurs dossiers sur l’assassinat. Les témoins ont bénéficié de l’immunité de témoignage, dont les dossiers ont été rapidement scellés. Est-ce que toute cette tromperie protégeait Lee Harvey Oswald, le soi-disant «Lone Assassin», et un homme déjà assassiné? Je ne le crois pas. Si Lee était si coupable et un «assassin solitaire», pourquoi tout ce drame?

Mes tâches ou buts dans ce chapitre sont double. La première tâche consiste à vous présenter, le lecteur, des preuves fondées sur des faits (y compris corrigées). La deuxième tâche consiste à fournir une compréhension claire et précise de ces éléments de preuve. Si je réussis dans ces deux buts, je n’ai aucun doute que ce qui s’est vraiment passé à Dallas commencera à devenir alarmante claire pour vous.
Le plus jeune président de l’histoire américaine a été assassiné le 22 novembre 1963. . . Mais ce n’était pas Lee Harvey Oswald qui l’a tué. Trois hommes sont morts ce week-end, Kennedy, Oswald et le policier de la police de Dallas, J.D. Tippit. Un quatrième homme a été grièvement blessé, le gouverneur John Connally. Aucun d’entre eux ne méritait leur sort.
Lee Harvey Oswald a rapidement été qualifié de «communiste», de «Lone Nut» et de «Lone Assassin». Oswald a été blâmé pour les blessures à Kennedy, Connally et Tippit, mais ces allégations ne sont pas vraies. Malheureusement, l’ex-épouse de Lee (Marina Oswald), sa mère Marguerite, ses deux filles (June et Rachel) et son frère (Robert) devraient tous porter le fardeau de la prétendue culpabilité de Lee pendant 53 ans.
Après des centaines et des milliers d’heures d’examen de la preuve, j’espère que ce que je révèle ici aujourd’hui coule po J’espère que finalement les Américains vont commencer à saisir la profondeur de la déception impliquant ces meurtres, avec une plus grande perception que jamais. Ce n’est pas la fin de la preuve prouvant le cadrage d’Oswald, c’est le début.

S.R. “Dusty” Rohde

CHAPITRE I

(Encadrement Lee Harvey Oswald)

La Commission Warren était l’organe d’enquête (de l’assassinat de JFK) nommé par le président Lyndon Baines Johnson, dirigé par le juge en chef Earl Warren. Johnson a été assermenté comme président à Love Field sur Air Force One, à Dallas, au Texas, peu après JFK a été assassiné.

Howard P. Willens était l’un des trois membres qui composaient le «personnel de supervision» du WC. Dans le livre de Willens «L’histoire nous prouvera le droit», il déclare: «J’ai été témoin de la rigueur, de la gravité et de l’intégrité avec lesquelles la Commission Warren a abordé sa tâche» (1). A cela je dois objecter. Willens a également proclamé «la critique de notre travail est sérieusement mal orientée» (2). Par la définition de Willens, je suis mal orienté. Dans ma défense, je ne peux que dire «au moins, je n’ai pas délibérément tromper le public américain», la Commission Warren et House Select Comité sur les assassinats a fait. Évidemment, je vais devoir justifier cette déclaration. En ce qui concerne la «minutie» par le WC va, je mentionnerai seulement que dans la communauté de recherche de JFK, le travail de la commission de Warren est communément appelé Warren Omissions. Cela est principalement dû à la quantité considérable de preuves qui n’ont pas été examinées, aux témoins qui n’ont pas été interrogés et ainsi de suite. Le label a beaucoup de validité, mais ce n’est pas la zone que je veux couvrir dans cet article. Je m’intéresse davantage à l’examen de l’intégrité du WC et de son sérieux allégué. En d’autres termes, le WC a-t-il dit la vérité, toute la vérité et rien que la vérité? Est-ce que le «comité de sélection de la Chambre sur les assassinats» (HSCA)? La réponse est non.

Le personnel de l’hôpital Parkland (à Dallas) a travaillé à l’origine sur JFK et John Connally immédiatement après qu’ils aient été blessés à Dealey Plaza. Plusieurs membres du personnel de Parkland ont ensuite été convoqués à titre de témoins lors des audiences de la Commission. Ces membres du personnel de Parkland ont délibérément montré de fausses images (avec des dessins d’artiste) représentant la tête de JFK et les blessures du dos (3). Ces images étaient une collection de dessins trompeurs supposés représenter les blessures de JFK. L’artiste Harold “Skip” Rydberg a été mandaté par le WC pour effectuer leur travail nécessaire (4). Artiste Ida Dox a été commandé plus tard en 1978 par l’HSCA pour créer plus d’artistes rendus des plaies de JFK. Les dessins d’Ida Dox donnent aussi de fausses représentations des blessures de JFK, mais dans ce cas, Ida Dox est responsable de toute fausse représentation des plaies de JFK. C’est parce que Ida Dox a eu accès aux images d’autopsie de JFK, aux rayons X et aux témoins précédents des audiences de WC; Elle les rapportait souvent (5). Le personnel de l’hôpital Parkland serait de nouveau appelé à donner des témoignages par l’ACSS en 1978, mais cette fois-ci, on leur montrerait de nouveaux dessins et des photographies modifiées illustrant des blessures fausses ou disparaissantes.

Je prétends que les fausses représentations de blessures ont été faites à travers deux interprétations d’artistes différents, un artiste qui savait quand ils ont créé les images qu’ils étaient faux, et un artiste qui n’a pas. La tromperie ne s’est pas arrêtée là. La tromperie est passée de dessins frauduleux à des tromperies photographiques modifiées présentées aux témoins de l’hôpital Parkland (lors des audiences de l’ACCS). Les photos les choquaient et les confondaient, ce que les images montraient, ce n’était pas les plaies du corps de JFK que ces témoins ont vu ou souvenu.

Avant que je montre les preuves médicales qui ont été mal représentées et comment, je veux que vous vous familiarisiez avec cette déclaration faite par Arlen Specter au personnel de WC. Arlen Spectre, en qualité de conseiller adjoint de la Commission Warren, a été le créateur de la «théorie de la balle unique» (6), qui impliquait l’utilisation de la balle «Pristine» (7). Bien que sa théorie soit erronée (démontrée dans cet article, je dois donner à M. Spectre le crédit pour la déclaration suivante.) Cette déclaration a été envoyée par Arlen Specter à MJ Lee Rankin, «conseiller général» de la Commission Warren. «La Commission doit déterminer avec certitude qu’il n’y a pas de grandes variations entre les films et les dessins de l’artiste. Les pièces de la commission n os 385, 386 et 388 ont été faites à partir des souvenirs des chirurgiens d’autopsie qui ont été racontés à l’artiste. Peut comparer les films et les dessins de l’artiste et trouver une erreur significative qui pourrait affecter substantiellement le témoignage essentiel et les conclusions de la Commission »(8). Cette déclaration de M. Spectre était très prophétique, parce que« un jour »est aujourd’hui, ici et maintenant Le personnel de la Commission Warren aurait dû écouter M. Spectre, et M. Spectre savait que les représentations artistiques n’étaient pas exactes et a tenté d’avertir le WC de son utilisation prévue. De l’embarras futur, mais ses paroles sont tombées dans l’oreille d’un sourd.

Dans le cas de Harold “Skip” Rydberg, ses dessins des blessures à JFK n’ont pas été délibérément faussés par son propre fait. M. Rydberg a reçu l’ordre de J.J. Humes quant à l’endroit où placer les plaies dans les dessins (9). Au moment des dessins, Rydberg n’avait jamais vu aucune des photographies réelles des blessures ou du corps lui-même, il était totalement dépendant de J.J. Humes pour donner des descriptions précises des plaies de JFK (10). J.J. Humes, en tant que chef chirurgien d’autopsie était certainement très familier avec les blessures de JFK et leurs emplacements. La responsabilité pour les erreurs dans les rendus d’artistes tombe directement sur les épaules Humes comme l’origine des erreurs dans les lieux de blessure. Vous pouvez sacrément bien parier que Humes savait mieux, il savait où les blessures d’entrée ont été, mais faussement identifié, par Rydberg. Ce que je dis, c’est que le commandant Humes, avec toute sa connaissance et son intention, était le créateur de la localisation des blessures frauduleuses et de l’identification. La question que nous devons nous poser est pourquoi Humes faire cela? Pourquoi Humes risque-t-il son grade et sa carrière de tenter une fraude? Il est vrai que Humes aurait pu le faire de sa propre volonté, mais le risque d’être pris aurait été considérable. Cette option, bien que possible, ne semble pas très probable. La seule raison plausible, je peux penser, c’est que quelqu’un au-dessus de la chaîne lui a ordonné de le faire. Humes n’a pas été invité à signer un accord de non-divulgation, mais commettre une fraude assurerait son silence. D’autres personnes impliquées dans l’autopsie ont été amenées à signer des ententes de non-divulgation ou ont dit de ne pas parler de l’autopsie par des représentants du gouvernement. Humes savait que ces gens ne parleraient pas longtemps. Humes était également conscient que les images d’autopsie étaient les plus susceptibles de ne jamais être libéré, car c’était contre ses souhaits et prétendument ceux du procureur général Robert Kennedy et de la famille Kennedy. Humes ignorait que, plusieurs années plus tard, la HSCA serait formée pour entamer une nouvelle enquête sur l’assassinat de JFK ou que certaines des images d’autopsie seraient disponibles. Si les images ne ressemblaient pas aux plaies de JFK, peu de gens connaîtraient la véritable étendue des blessures de JFK ou les déceptions délibérées commises par Humes et Ida Dox pendant les audiences de la WC et de l’HSCA.

Donc, plutôt que de simplement parler de la blessure fausses déclarations et des tromperies, je vais vous les montrer. Les images de Rydberg sont des expositions CE385, CE386 et CE388 (11), (12).

Les trois images montrées ci-dessus sont les dessins des blessures de JFK créées par Harold Rydberg, selon les descriptions de blessures qui lui ont été données par J.J. Humes.

Je vais aborder les erreurs de pose de plaie sur l’image centrale (CE 386) d’abord, car cela montre directement les fausses représentations de CE 385 et CE 388. Les deux blessures d’entrée dans CE 386 sont dans les mauvaises positions, les deux plaies sont Montrés plus haut qu’ils étaient réellement et ce n’était pas un accident. Vérifier que ces plaies sont localisées de manière inexacte; Je vais me reporter au témoignage donné par le 2e lieutenant Richard Lipsey lors des audiences de l’ACCS. Le Lt Lipsey était présent pendant la majorité de l’autopsie de JFK à l’hôpital Bethesda (13). Lipsey a été ordonné par Generel Wehle de rester avec le corps en tout temps. Le 2e lieutenant Richard Lipsey était l’aide du général Wehle, qui était chargé des arrangements funéraires et des événements connexes. La référence de M. Lipsey à cette blessure particulière est celle où il parle d’une balle entrant «à l’arrière de la tête» ou «haut dans le cou», mais «dans la ligne des cheveux» et se termine dans la «éruption “. Le témoignage de Lipsey peut être entendu à ce lien (14). Vous pouvez également lire le témoignage de Lipsey transcrit à ce lien (15).

M. Lipsey indique spécifiquement que la blessure d’entrée à l’arrière de la tête de JFK était «dans la ligne des cheveux», ce qui signifie que les cheveux de JFK se termine au niveau du bord inférieur, à l’arrière du cou. Il déclare également que cette blessure d’entrée était un «trou rond». Ainsi, alors que le dessin de Rydberg dans CE 386 montre la blessure d’entrée ronde, il est placé trop haut. Arlen Spector déclare également qu’aucun des médecins de l’hôpital Parkland de Dallas n’a observé le trou dans le dos du président ou le petit trou dans la partie inférieure de sa tête (16). Le fait que le personnel de l’hôpital de Parkland ait ou non vu la blessure au dos ou la petite blessure d’entrée à la tête de JFK n’est pas important. Ce qui importe, c’est que, ici, Arlen Spectre se réfère également à la même blessure de balle notée par M. Lipsey. Arlen Spectre remarquait des objections spécifiques aux dessins de Rydberg: «Le dessin des artistes préparé à Bethesda (CE n ° 385 et 386) montre un léger angle de déclinaison. Il est difficile, sinon impossible, d’expliquer un tel angle de déclin »(17). . . Se référant à l’angle de trajectoire nécessaire pour prouver que le tir est venu du Texas School Book Depository (TSBD). De là, les choses vont de mal en pis. C’est parce que Arlen Specter a fait ces observations, il n’avait jamais vu le corps de JFK ou les photographies d’Autopsie (18). Si nous corrigeons les emplacements de blessure (en les déplaçant vers les positions correctes), cela diminue l’angle de déclinaison à un degré encore plus élevé!

À ce stade, j’ai corrigé l’emplacement de la tête de JFK (entrée) et vous pouvez voir comment cela modifie considérablement la trajectoire de la plaie (voir image suivante).

Si Spectre pensait qu’il serait difficile d’expliquer un tel angle de déclin avec les blessures dans les endroits faux, il devient beaucoup plus difficile à partir des emplacements corrigés! Voici votre premier indice majeur que quelque chose n’était pas juste dans la maison de la tromperie. Bien sûr, comme je l’ai dit, Arlen Specter n’avait aucune idée que les blessures réelles étaient inférieures à ce qui était montré dans les dessins de Rydberg, s’il avait su qu’il aurait regardé en incrédulité, sachant qu’il devrait prouver que ce coup est venu pour le sixième étage Du TSBD.

(* Note des auteurs: Je ne veux pas que vous pensiez que la trajectoire montrée dans l’image ci-dessus est la trajectoire exacte, elle n’est pas, mais elle est très proche).

La blessure au cou représentée dans les dessins de Rydberg crée un problème bien plus important que la blessure à la tête. En premier lieu, là encore, la blessure est montrée bien au-dessus de l’emplacement réel de la plaie. Dans les dessins de Rydberg, la deuxième blessure est montrée en fait dans le cou de JFK, ce qui n’était pas le cas. J.J. Humes a dû savoir que cette blessure n’était pas dans le cou de JFK. Comment ne le pouvait-il pas? La seule raison pour déplacer cette blessure à partir de son emplacement réel était dans le seul but de créer une fausse trajectoire de balle vers le bas (montrée dans CE 385) et de tenter de créer une trajectoire qui serait un match plus proche du sixième étage snipers nid. En corrigeant l’emplacement de la plaie par les images d’autopsie JFK, nous arriverions avec une nouvelle trajectoire (voir image suivante).

Maintenant, rappelez-vous, Arlen Specter avait des doutes sur la preuve que les coups de feu provenaient du TSBD à partir de leurs points d’entrée faux. Comme on le voit dans l’image ci-dessus, le point d’entrée allégué, par J.J. Humes était dans le cou. La blessure réelle Humes se réfère à est en dessous de la ligne de l’épaule d’environ un pouce et demi. Specter aurait certainement beaucoup plus de mal à prouver que les plans provenaient du TSBD à partir des nouveaux points d’entrée corrigés et des trajectoires qui en résultent, mais. . . Les choses obtiennent toujours beaucoup, bien pire, comme si elles ne sont pas déjà assez mal.

Arlen Spectre a développé la «Théorie de la balle unique», (une seule balle passait par JFK et le Gouverneur John Connally), basée sur des lieux de blessures fictives et de fausses trajectoires. Mais il y a autre chose que M. Spectre ne savait pas. Non seulement J.J. Humes déformer les lieux de la blessure, il a faussement identifié un fragment “Sortie” blessure comme une blessure d’entrée! La prétendue «blessure d’entrée» présentée par J.J. Humes, n’est pas une blessure d’entrée du tout, c’est une blessure EXIT! L’ensemble de la théorie de balle unique et la trajectoire associée est basée sur deux blessures de sortie! Les gens, le SBT est sur le point de monter en flammes.

Ne le croyez pas? Vous verrez, après avoir vu la prochaine édition demain … rester à l’écoute pour un choc!

CITATIONS

Chapitre un:

 

1. «L’histoire nous prouvera», par Howard P. Willens, page 12.
2. «L’histoire nous prouvera», par Howard P. Willens, page 12.
3. Témoignages médicaux, Commission Warren, Vol.
4. ARRB Témoignage de James Joseph Humes, page 227, http://assassinationofjfk.net/for-the-sake-of-historical-accuracy/

5. HSCA Témoignage d’Ida Dox, page 147, http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol1/html/HSCA_Vol1_0076a.htm
6. “Théorie de la balle unique”, https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Single_Bullet_Theory.html
7. “Balle vierge”, (CE 399) http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0038a.htm
8. JFK Pièce n ° 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=98&tab=page

9. ARRB Témoignage de James Joseph Humes, page 229, http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/humesa.htm
10. Déclaration de Harold “Skip” Rydberg, http://assassinationofjfk.net/for-the-sake-of-historical-accuracy/
11. Dessins de Rydberg, (CE385, CE386), https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pdf/WH16_CE_385.pdf
12. Rydberg Drawing, (CE388), https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pdf/WH16_CE_388.pdf

13. Lipsey Doc
14. Lipsey, Richard A., Témoignage vidéo, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9UZz07eNMc
15. Lipsey, Richard A., HSCA Témoignage, http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/med_testimony/Lipsey_1-18-78/HSCA-Lipsey.htm
16. JFK Pièce n ° 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page
17. JFK Pièce n ° 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page
18. JFK Pièce n ° 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page

 

 

 

Engaño de la muerte, Enmarcado de Lee Harvey Oswald

Engaño de la muerte, Enmarcado de Lee Harvey Oswald

Con S.r. Dusty Rohde

©Noviembre, 2016

EXPRESIONES DE GRATITUD:

Quiero agradecer especialmente a Gayle Nix-Jackson, Michael Doherty y Ted Rubenstein, todos los que ayudaron a desencadenar los caminos que condujeron a los descubrimientos en los próximos artículos. También, un agradecimiento especial a Linda Giovanna Zambanini para escuchar y ayuda constante con mis peticiones.

PRÓLOGO
Durante 53 años, una batalla ha estado haciendo estragos entre dos grupos. Los grupos son los “Lone Nutters” (LNer’s) y los “Teóricos de la Conspiración” (CTer’s). Estos dos grupos tienen puntos de vista opuestos sobre si el presidente John F. Kennedy fue asesinado por Lee Harvey Oswald, o por otros que con éxito cometieron un golpe de Estado en Estados Unidos.
El presidente John F. Kennedy fue asesinado el 22 de noviembre de 1963 en Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas. Lee Harvey Oswald, la persona marcada como asesino de JFK fue asesinado dos días más tarde mientras estaba bajo custodia policial, por Jack Ruby, propietario del Carousel Club. Jack Ruby era amigo del pecho con una gran parte de los empleados de la policía de Dallas y tenía numerosos vínculos con el crimen organizado.

Habiendo investigado el asesinato de JFK durante años, hace mucho tiempo descubrí que hay una montaña de desinformación en existencia relacionada con este caso. Esta desinformación proviene de ambos lados de la valla, es decir, de “LNer’s” y “CTer’s”. Gran parte de esta desinformación ha sido deliberada, y algunos accidental. Ninguna de estas informaciones falsas ha beneficiado una resolución al caso de asesinato; Toda la información falsa es engañosa y paraliza cualquier comprensión de lo que ocurrió en ese día fatídico. La propia Comisión Warren presentó deliberadamente pruebas falsas relacionadas con las heridas de JFK. El FBI de Hoover retuvo pruebas y sigue haciéndolo aún hoy. La CIA continúa negándose a publicar sus registros sobre el asesinato. A los testigos se les concedió inmunidad para declarar, cuyos registros fueron sellados rápidamente. ¿Fue todo este engaño para proteger a Lee Harvey Oswald, el supuesto “asesino solitario”, y un hombre ya asesinado? No lo creo. Si Lee era tan culpable y un “asesino solitario”, ¿por qué todo este drama?

Mis tareas o metas en este capítulo son dos. La primera tarea es presentarle, el lector, pruebas basadas en hechos (incluyendo correcciones). La segunda tarea es ayudar a proporcionar una comprensión clara y precisa de esa evidencia. Si logro estos dos objetivos, no tengo ninguna duda de que lo que realmente sucedió en Dallas comenzará a ser alarmantemente claro para usted.
El presidente más joven de la historia americana fue asesinado el 22 de noviembre de 1963. . . Pero no fue Lee Harvey Oswald quien lo mató. Tres hombres murieron ese fin de semana, Kennedy, Oswald y el policía de la policía de Dallas, J.D. Tippit. Un cuarto hombre fue gravemente herido, el Gobernador John Connally. Ninguno de ellos merecía su destino.

Lee Harvey Oswald fue rápidamente calificado de “comunista”, “loco en la cabeza” y “Solitario Asesino”. Oswald fue culpado por las heridas de Kennedy, Connally y Tippit, pero esas acusaciones no son ciertas. Lamentablemente, la ex esposa de Lee (Marina Oswald), su madre Marguerite, sus dos hijas (Junio y Rachel) y su hermano (Robert) tendrían que cargar con la carga de la supuesta culpa de Lee durante 53 años.
Después de centenares y de millares de horas que examinan la evidencia, espero que lo que revelo aquí hoy se hunde adentro. Espero que finalmente los americanos comiencen a entender la profundidad del engaño que implica estos asesinatos, con una mayor percepción que siempre antes. Este no es el final de la evidencia que demuestra el marco de Oswald, es el principio.

S.R. “Dusty” Rohde

CAPÍTULO I

(Enmarcando a Lee Harvey Oswald)

La Comisión Warren fue el cuerpo investigador (del asesinato de JFK) nombrado por el presidente Lyndon Baines Johnson, encabezado por el jefe de Justicia Earl Warren. Johnson fue juramentado como presidente en el campo del amor en la fuerza aérea una, en Dallas, Tejas, poco después de JFK fue asesinado.

Howard P. Willens era uno de los tres miembros que componían el “personal de supervisión” de la WC. En el libro de Willens “La historia nos demostrará que es correcto”, declara, “fui testigo del rigor, la seriedad y la integridad con que la Comisión de Warren se acercó a su tarea” (1). A esto debo objetar. Willens también proclamó que “la crítica de nuestro trabajo está seriamente equivocada” (2). Por la definición de Willens, estoy equivocado. En mi defensa sólo puedo decir “por lo menos no engañé deliberadamente al público americano”, la Comisión Warren y el Comité Selecto de Cámara sobre Asesinatos lo hicieron. Obviamente, voy a tener que justificar esa declaración.

En cuanto a la “minuciosidad” por el WC va, sólo voy a mencionar que en la comunidad de investigación JFK, el trabajo de la Comisión Warren se conoce comúnmente como The Warren Omissions. Esto se debe principalmente a la considerable cantidad de evidencia que no se examinó, a los testigos que no fueron interrogados y así sucesivamente. La etiqueta tiene mucha validez, pero no es el área que quiero incluir en este artículo. Estoy más interesado en examinar la integridad del WC y su supuesta seriedad. En otras palabras, ¿los WC dicen la verdad, toda la verdad y nada más que la verdad? ¿El “Comité Selecto de la Cámara de Asesinatos” (HSCA)? La respuesta es no.

El personal del hospital Parkland (en Dallas) trabajó originalmente en JFK y John Connally inmediatamente después de que fueran heridos en Dealey Plaza. Varios miembros del personal de Parkland fueron llamados más adelante como testigos durante las audiencias del WC. A estos miembros del personal de Parkland se les mostraron deliberadamente imágenes falsas (con dibujos de artistas) que representaban las heridas de cabeza y espalda de JFK (3). Estas imágenes eran una colección de dibujos engañosos alegados para representar las heridas de JFK. El artista Harold “Skip” Rydberg fue comisionado por el WC para realizar su trabajo necesario (4). El artista Ida Dox fue encargado más adelante en 1978 por el HSCA para crear más representaciones del artista de las heridas de JFK. Los dibujos de Ida Dox también dan falsas representaciones de las heridas de JFK, pero en este caso, Ida Dox es responsable de cualquier representación falsa de las heridas de JFK. Esto se debe a que Ida Dox tuvo acceso a las imágenes de la autopsia JFK, radiografías y testimonios de testigos previos de las audiencias del WC; Las refería con frecuencia (5). El personal del hospital Parkland volvería a ser llamado a dar testimonios por la HSCA en 1978, sólo que esta vez, se les mostraría nuevos dibujos y fotografías alteradas que representan falsas o desaparecer las heridas.

Mi argumento es que las falsas representaciones de heridas se hicieron a través de dos interpretaciones de artistas diferentes, un artista que sabía cuando crearon las imágenes que eran falsas, y un artista que no lo hizo. El engaño no se detuvo allí sin embargo. El engaño creció de los dibujos fraudulentos a los engaños fotográficos alterados presentados a los testigos del hospital de Parkland, (en las audiencias de HSCA). Las fotos las sacudían y las confundían, lo que las imágenes mostraban, no eran las heridas al cuerpo de JFK que estos testigos vieron o recordaron.

Antes de que muestre la evidencia médica que fue mal representada y cómo, quiero que se familiarice con esta declaración hecha por Arlen Specter al personal de WC. Arlen Specter, como asesor asistente de la Comisión Warren, fue el creador de la “Teoría de la Bala Única” (6), que involucró el uso de la bala “Prístina” (7). Mientras que su teoría es errónea (demostrada en este artículo, tengo que dar crédito al Sr. Spectre por la siguiente declaración: Esta declaración fue enviada por Arlen Specter al Sr. J. Lee Rankin, “consejero general” de la Comisión Warren. Cita: “La Comisión debe determinar con certeza que no hay grandes variaciones entre las películas y los dibujos del artista, las pruebas de la Comisión 385, 386 y 388 se hicieron a partir de los recuerdos de los cirujanos de autopsia como se le dijo al artista. Puede comparar las películas y los dibujos del artista y encontrar un error significativo que pudiera afectar sustancialmente el testimonio esencial y las conclusiones de la Comisión “(8) Esta declaración del Sr. Spectre fue muy profética, porque ese” algún día “es hoy, aquí y ahora .El personal de la Comisión Warren debió haber escuchado al Sr. Spectre y yo sugeriría que el Sr. Spectre sabía que las representaciones artísticas no eran exactas y trató de advertir a la WC de su uso previsto.El Sr. Spectre estaba tratando de impedir que los miembros del WC De vergüenza futura, pero sus palabras cayeron en oídos sordos.

En el caso de Harold “Skip” Rydberg, sus dibujos de las heridas de JFK no fueron deliberadamente malinterpretados por su propio hacer. El Sr. Rydberg fue instruido por J.J. Humes en cuanto a dónde colocar las heridas en los dibujos (9). En el momento de los dibujos, Rydberg nunca había visto ninguna de las fotografías reales de las heridas o del propio cuerpo, era totalmente dependiente de J.J. Humes para dar descripciones precisas de las heridas de JFK (10). J.J. Humes, como cirujano jefe de autopsia era sin duda muy familiarizado con las heridas de JFK y sus ubicaciones. La responsabilidad por cualquier error en las representaciones del artista cae directamente en los hombros de Humes como el origen de los errores en las localizaciones de la herida. Puedes jodidamente apostar que Humes sabía mejor, él sabía dónde estaban las heridas de entrada, pero falsamente las identificó, a través de Rydberg. Lo que estoy diciendo es, en blanco, el comandante Humes con pleno conocimiento y la intención fue el creador de las localizaciones de la herida fraudulenta y la identificación. La pregunta que tenemos que hacernos es por qué Humes hacer esto? ¿Por qué Humes arriesgaría su rango y su carrera para intentar fraude? Es cierto que Humes pudo haber hecho esto por su propia voluntad, pero el riesgo de ser atrapado habría sido considerable. Esta opción, aunque es posible, no parece muy probable. La única razón plausible que puedo pensar, es que alguien más arriba de la cadena le ordenó que lo hiciera. A Humes no se le pidió que firmara un acuerdo de no divulgación, pero cometer fraude aseguraría su silencio. Otras personas involucradas en la autopsia fueron hechas para firmar acuerdos de no divulgación o le dijeron que no hablaran de la autopsia por parte de funcionarios gubernamentales. Humes sabía que estas personas no estarían hablando durante mucho tiempo. Humes también era consciente de que las imágenes de la autopsia probablemente nunca serían liberadas, ya que esto estaba en contra de sus deseos y supuestamente los del Fiscal General Robert Kennedy y la familia Kennedy. Humes no tenía ni idea de que muchos años después se formaría la HSCA para iniciar una nueva investigación sobre el asesinato de JFK o que algunas de las imágenes de la autopsia estarían disponibles. Si las imágenes no hubiesen salido de las heridas de JFK, pocas personas sabrían la verdadera extensión de las heridas de JFK o los engaños deliberados cometidos por Humes e Ida Dox durante las audiencias de WC y HSCA.

Por lo tanto, en lugar de simplemente hablar de la herida tergiversaciones y engaños, voy a mostrar a usted. Las imágenes de Rydberg son WC exhibe CE385, CE386 y CE388 (11), (12).

Las tres imágenes mostradas arriba son los dibujos de las heridas de JFK creadas por Harold Rydberg, según las descripciones de la herida que le dio J.J. Humes.

Voy a abordar los errores en la colocación de la herida en la imagen del centro (CE 386) en primer lugar, ya que esto muestra directamente las falsas representaciones de CE 385 y CE 388. Ambas heridas de entrada en CE 386 están en las posiciones equivocadas, ambas heridas son Mostrada más arriba de lo que realmente eran y esto no fue un accidente. Verificar que estas heridas están localizadas incorrectamente; Voy a referirme al testimonio dado por el segundo teniente Richard Lipsey durante las audiencias de HSCA. El teniente Lipsey estuvo presente durante la mayoría de la autopsia de JFK en el Hospital Bethesda (13). El general Wehle ordenó a Lipsey que se quedara con el cuerpo todo el tiempo. El segundo teniente Richard Lipsey fue ayudante del general Wehle, quien estaba a cargo de arreglos funerarios y eventos relacionados. La referencia del Sr. Lipsey a esta herida en particular es aquella en la que habla de una bala que entra en “la parte baja de la cabeza” y / o “en la parte superior del cuello”, pero “en la línea del pelo” y termina en la ” “. El testimonio de Lipsey puede escucharse en este enlace (14). También puede leer el testimonio de Lipsey transcrito en este enlace (15).

El Sr. Lipsey declara específicamente que la herida de entrada en la parte posterior de la cabeza de JFK estaba “en la línea del pelo”, significando donde el cabello de JFK termina en el borde inferior, en la parte posterior del cuello. También afirma que esta herida fue un “agujero redondo”. Así, mientras que el dibujo de Rydberg en CE 386 muestra la herida de entrada redonda, se coloca demasiado alto. Arlen Spector también afirma que “ninguno de los médicos del Parkland Hospital de Dallas observó el agujero en la espalda del Presidente o el pequeño agujero en la parte inferior de su cabeza” (16). No importa si el personal del hospital Parkland vio la herida de la espalda o la pequeña herida de entrada en la cabeza de JFK. Lo que importa es que aquí, Arlen Specter también se refiere a la misma herida de entrada de bala señalada por el Sr. Lipsey. Arlen Specter señaló algunas objeciones específicas relacionadas con los dibujos de Rydberg: “El dibujo de artistas preparado en Bethesda (CE No. 385 y 386) muestra un ligero ángulo de declinación. Es difícil, si no imposible, explicar un ángulo tan leve de declinación “(17). . . Refiriéndose al ángulo necesario de la trayectoria para demostrar que el tiro vino del depósito de libro escolar de Tejas (TSBD). Desde aquí, las cosas van de mal en peor. Esto se debe a que cuando Arlen Specter hizo estas observaciones, nunca había visto el cuerpo de JFK ni las fotografías de Autopsia (18). Si corregimos las localizaciones de la herida, (moviéndolas más abajo a las posiciones correctas), esto entonces disminuye el ángulo de la declinación incluso a un gran grado!

En este punto, he corregido la cabeza de JFK (entrada) localización de la herida y se puede ver cómo dramáticamente esto cambia la trayectoria de la herida (ver imagen siguiente).

Si Arlen Specter pensó que sería difícil explicar un ángulo tan bajo de declinación con las heridas en las localizaciones falsas, ¡se vuelve mucho más difícil a partir de las localizaciones corregidas! Aquí está su primera pista importante de que algo no estaba bien en la casa del engaño. Por supuesto, como ya he dicho, Arlen Specter no tenía ni idea de que las heridas reales eran inferiores a las que se mostraban en los dibujos de Rydberg, si hubiera sabido que lo habría mirado con incredulidad, sabiendo que se esperaría que probara que este disparo llegó al sexto piso De la TSBD.

(* Nota de los autores: No quiero que pienses que la trayectoria mostrada en la imagen de arriba es la trayectoria exacta, no lo es, pero está muy cerca).

La herida del cuello representada en los dibujos de Rydberg crea un problema mucho mayor que la herida en la cabeza. En primer lugar, aquí de nuevo, la herida se muestra muy por encima de la localización de la herida real. En los dibujos de Rydberg, la segunda herida se muestra realmente en el cuello de JFK, que no era. J.J. Humes tuvo que saber que esta herida no estaba en el cuello de JFK. ¿Cómo no? La única razón para mover esta herida de su ubicación real fue con el único propósito de crear una falsa trayectoria de bala hacia abajo (mostrada en CE 385) e intentar crear una trayectoria que sería una coincidencia más cercana con el francotirador del sexto piso. Al corregir la ubicación de la herida por las imágenes de la autopsia JFK, llegaríamos con una nueva trayectoria (ver imagen siguiente).

Ahora recuerde, Arlen Specter tenía dudas acerca de probar que los tiros provenían de la TSBD desde sus puntos de entrada falsos. Como se ve en la imagen anterior, el supuesto punto de entrada, por J.J. Humes estaba en el cuello. La herida real a que se refiere Humes está por debajo de la línea del hombro alrededor de una pulgada y media. Espectro sin duda tendría un tiempo mucho más difícil demostrar que los disparos fueron de la TSBD de los nuevos puntos de entrada corregidos y trayectorias resultantes, pero. . . Las cosas siguen siendo mucho, mucho peor, como si ya no son lo suficientemente malo.

Arlen Specter desarrolló la “Teoría de Bala Única”, (que una sola bala pasó a través de JFK y el Gobernador John Connally), basado en lugares de heridas ficticias y trayectorias falsas. Pero hay algo más que el señor Spectre no sabía. No sólo J.J. Humes tergiversar las localizaciones de la herida, que falsamente identificó un fragmento “Salir” herida como una herida de entrada! La supuesta herida “de entrada” presentada por J.J. Humes, no es una herida de entrada en absoluto, es una herida EXIT! Toda la teoría de la bala única y la trayectoria asociada se basa en dos heridas de salida! Gente, el SBT está a punto de arder.

¿No lo crees? Lo harás, después de ver la próxima edición de mañana …. ¡estad atentos para una sorpresa!

CITACIONES

 

Capítulo uno:

 

1. “La historia nos demostrará a la derecha”, por Howard P. Willens, página 12.

2. “La historia nos demostrará a la derecha”, por Howard P. Willens, página 12.
3. Testimonios Médicos, Comisión Warren, Vol.
4. ARRB Testimonio de James Joseph Humes, página 227,     http://assassinationofjfk.net/for-the-sake-of-historical-accuracy/

5. HSCA Testimonio de Ida Dox, página 147, http://aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol1/html/HSCA_Vol1_0076a.htm
6. “Teoría de bala única”, https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Single_Bullet_Theory.html
7. “Bala prístina”, (CE 399) http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0038a.htm
8. JFK Prueba documental 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=98&tab=page

9. ARRB Testimonio de James Joseph Humes, página 229, http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/humesa.htm
 

10. Declaración de Harold “Skip” Rydberg, http://assassinationofjfk.net/for-the-sake-of-historical-accuracy/
11. Dibujos de Rydberg, (CE385, CE386), https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pdf/WH16_CE_385.pdf
12. Dibujo de Rydberg, (CE388), https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/pdf/WH16_CE_388.pdf

13. Lipsey Doc
14. Lipsey, Richard A., Video Testimony, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9UZz07eNMc
15. Lipsey, Richard A., HSCA Testimonio, http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/med_testimony/Lipsey_1-18-78/HSCA-Lipsey.htm
16. JFK Prueba documental 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page
17. JFK Prueba documental 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page
18. JFK Prueba documental 11, HSCA, https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=83&search=Arlan_Spector#relPageId=99&tab=page

 

Death Deception, (The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald, Part (IX)

Death Deception, (The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald, Part (IX).

By S.r. “Dusty” Rohde

©March 2017

In the previous article, I mentioned that proving Lee Harvey Oswald purchased the MC rifle in March, 1963 (using the Hidell alias) did not prove he owned the rifle in November, 1963. There are still ongoing debates as to whether or not Oswald used the “Hidell” alias. At this point, it is necessary to clear up some confusion on this matter. Was Lee Harvey Oswald using the Alek Hiddel alias?

Fact #1: Marina Oswald referred to Lee as “Alek” in letters she wrote to her aunt and uncle residing in Russia. (See Below)

LETTER 1:  JUNE 20, 1962. (Excerpts from Marina writing to her aunt and uncle in Russia)

“From Moscow to Holland we traveled through Germany and Poland.  Rotterdam where we were a day and a half I liked very much except that the weather was cold for summer.  Alek (Lee) and I (Marina) walked around in our coats. We were in New York for a day. In the evening Alek and I (Marina) and Marin(k)a (June) went to see Broadway.  Broadway is very beautiful and not the way it was shown to us in the movies.  There are many lights, stores, and Negroes.  I have not gotten used to it yet.”

“Robert (Oswald) in life is very appealing — more so than Alek (Lee) and more than in his photographs.”

“We will probably be living here half a year until Alek can rent a house.  He still has not started work.”

LETTER 2:  DECEMBER 26, 1962.

“Alek was also very happy and read the letter himself.” (See link below)

http://www.russianbooks.org/oswald/letters.htm

In letters written to Oswald by his friend “Pavel” (also from Russia), he too referred to Lee as “Alek”.

Fact #2: Lee H. Oswald also used the alias “Hiddel” on more than one occasion on some of his job applications (See Below).

(Quote below from Robert Oswald, Look magazine, page 74, . . .10/17/1967).

The image shown above is of one of Oswald’s job applications using the “Hiddel” alias, but with a different first name than the application shown below (Next image)

Then here again the Hidell alias was used on the “Fair Play for Cuba Committee” card, the money order for the MC rifle and the Selective Service card held by Oswald and the order form from Klein’s. (See next four images below)

These are not all of the documents using the variations of the “Alek” or “Hidell” aliases. Based on existing evidence, there is about a 95% probability that Oswald was indeed using the Alek and Hiddell aliases and it would be hard to argue the point. This is supported in part by Oswald’s statement at the time of his arrest, “Now they’ll find out who I really am”. Robert Oswald also stated that the P.O. Box 2915 was the address that Lee himself gave to Robert for mailing purposes (prior to the assassination). The P.O. Box 2915 was rented under the Hidell alias, not Oswald’s name. There are several problems with documents in relationship to the purchase of both the MC rifle and pistol Lee H. Oswald allegedly purchased under the Hidell alias. Some of the documents may have been forged by someone other than Oswald; those will be addressed at a later point. There is one thing I would like to identify and clear up related to the P.O. Boxes though.

• Most people are aware that the MC rifle was said to be sent to Oswald under the alias Hidell. One might assume the rifle was sent to A. Hidell at the P.O. Box listed under Oswald’s name, which is a bit misleading. The P.O. Box the rifle was sent to was rented under the A. Hidell alias. Oswald’s normal P.O. Box, under his own name, was very near to Jack Ruby’s; in fact they were so close to each other they could practically reach out and touch each other. Oswald’s and Rubies P.O. Boxes were rented just a few weeks prior to the assassination. Jack Ruby rented his P.O. Box just six days after Oswald opened his. (See images below)

I’m not going to debate the purchase of the pistol and rifle at this point. What I want people to understand is that Oswald did use the Alek and Hidell aliases. The question is why does the Alek Hiddell alias matter outside of purchasing weapons? Nearly every Warren Commission supporter, Warren Commission apologist and Disinfo asset claimed there was no connection between Ferrie and Oswald. David Ferrie was not even mentioned in the Warren Report. The following bit of evidence shows clear evidence of a connection between Ferrie and Hiddel-Oswald. (See below)

This is a flight plan that was made out by David Ferrie on April 8^th, 1963, (two days prior to the General Walker shooting). Pay particular attention to the passenger’s names listed in the lower right corner. Those names are “Hidell” (Oswald), “Cambert or Lambert” (possibly Patricia Lambert or her brother Jack, CIA) and “Diaz” (most probably Herminio Diaz). Then also keep in mind that the total number of passengers for this flight on this plane was four…remember it. Note that this flight plan was from “Hammond” to “Garland” Texas. This flight plan is solid documented evidence of a Ferrie-Hidell connection, and this is the only flight plan that we know about. Who knows how many others there may have been? Other collaborating evidence further supports the fact that Ferrie flew Oswald (Hidell) to Texas. (See Below)

And of course, most people familiar with the JFK assassination are aware of the following photo of the C.A.P. (Civil Air Patrol) squadron showing David Ferrie and Oswald in the same photo. Please make a mental note of the differences between the bodies of Oswald (rail thin) and Ferries (chubby). (See below)

So far, the previous evidence indicates direct documented connections between Ferrie and Hidell-Oswald and probable connections with Patricia or Jack Lambert and Herminio Diaz.  Patricia Lambert (formerly CIA) wrote the book “False Witness”, blasting Jim Garrison over the trial of Clay Shaw. (See below)

In Jim Garrison’s trial of Clay Shaw, Garrison asserted that there was a relationship between Shaw, Ferrie and Oswald, and that Clay Shaw and the others were allegedly involved in a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy. During the Shaw trial there was a great deal of interference during the trial by the CIA and other government agencies that refused extradition of witnesses, documents were stolen, offices were bugged, etc. Jim Garrison was unable to convince the jury of the connections between Shaw and the other individuals or involvement in JFK’s assassination. As a result, Clay Shaw would eventually be declared “not guilty”, although that doesn’t mean that Shaw told the truth during the trial. (See next two images)

The attorney Dean Andrews was questioned by Jim Garrison during the Shaw trial and eventually charged and convicted of perjury by Garrison. During this time, Dean Andrews gave some recorded interviews of significance. Dean would state at one point that Garrison “has the right Ho-ho but the wrong Ta-ta”. (See link below)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC4Thob_2kc

That comment by Andrews has stuck with me ever since I heard it. In essence, Andrews was telling Garrison, he had the right group (or direction) but the wrong person (although Andrews was referring to Manuel Garcia Gonzalez in this interview). As it turns out, this statement by Dean Andrews was prophetic, because had Garrison gone after David Ferrie first, rather than Clay Shaw, the outcome of an assassination trial might have been very, very different.

In 1960, David Ferrie and Eladio Del Valle were both working as CIA assets. Eladio Del Valle was found murdered within 12 hours of David Ferrie’s death on 22 Feb. 1967. Robert Morrow, former CIA agent (not to be confused with the Robert Morrow associated with Roger Stone), stated he supplied transceiver radios to Del Valle, and delivered four MC rifles to Ferrie. (See the following link and next two images).

 

• http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKmorrow.htm
• http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKeladio.htm
• http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKferrie.htm

At this point, I need to demonstrate the connections asserted by Jim Garrison by identifying the locations, the events and individuals involved. I’ll also have to provide information on connections less known. Most people familiar with the history of Lee Harvey Oswald are familiar with Oswald’s handing out the FPCC (Fair Play for Cuba Committee flyers). (See below)

Some of you may think that Oswald was handing out his flyers haphazardly, meaning wherever was convenient, but that isn’t true. The members of the 544 Camp Street crew would be found at different locations at different times, moving from the Baltar Building, Canal Street, 544 Camp Street and eventually the International Trade Mart. Where ever the 544 Camp Street crew went, Oswald went. This would make sense, after all. . . when Bill Dalzell was giving Oswald a hard time, Bannister reportedly said to Dalzell “Cool it, he is with us” meaning Oswald. That said, remember the information posted previously that “all members of the group were screened by the FBI and CIA”. If Oswald was a member of their group as Bannister suggested, the screening would have included Oswald, right? Each of those locations where Oswald handed out flyers were associated with anti-Castro Cuban groups, the groups and locations are listed below.

 

• 544 Camp St., New Orleans, Louisiana. This was the location of Guy Bannister’s office, as well as the office of Sergio Aracha Smith and his group the “Cuban Revolutionary Democratic Front”. The events at this location involved six individuals, five of which were very familiar with each other. (See below)

• Canal Street, New Orleans, Louisiana. This was the location where Carlos Bringuier started the fight with Oswald. More than just these two individuals were involved. Bringuier had friends with him; all of them affiliated with the anti-Castro group DRE “the Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil”, also known as the (Cuban Student Directorate); Ed Butler was also associated with events related to this location, but not a member of the DRE itself. Oswald and Ferrie would both be handing out Cuban flyers on Canal Street on the same day, Oswalds pro-Castro, and Ferrie’s anti-Castro. (See below)

• The International Trade Mart, New Orleans. Clay Shaw was founder and Managing Director of the ITM. Here again, a number of individuals connected to the ITM were associated with Oswald. This was also the location where the anti-Castro group, the “Friends of Democratic Cuba, Inc” would eventually move to. Sergio Aracha Smith would also eventually move his anti-Castro group to this same location. Individuals connected to Oswald from the ITM are shown below (See next image).

I’ll provide a map with these locations marked as well as a few others that are relevant, all of these events at these locations were very much connected. (See below)

In 1961, Sergio Aracha Smith had an anti-Castro group known as the “Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front” or CDRF. This group was originally located at 207 Balter building in New Orleans. During this period, Carlos Bringuier was a participant in this group, later moving to the anti-Castro group DRE. At this time, Guy Bannister had his office for a private detective agency “Guy Bannister Associates, Inc”, at 434 Balter Building. (See next image)

Later, both Bannister and Sergio would move to the ground floor of the Newman building at 531 Lafayette Street. The 544 Camp street address was at this same location, but around the corner with a separate entrance to the same building. (See 544 Camp street building below)

So let’s examine the 544 Camp Street address first. Evidence shows that the five individuals involved with events at this location were far more familiar with each other than has been expressed over the years. From this location, on Jan. 9^th, 1961 papers are filed to form a new anti-Castro group, involving persons from this location. (See images below)

     

As these documents show, Guy Bannister was on the board of Directors of the new anti-Castro group known as the “FDC”. Jack S. Martin signed as a witness (who worked for Guy Bannister). George P. Tugajue (Tujague) was one of the Officers (an alleged former employer of Lee Harvey Oswald between 1955 and 1956). Again, these documents were filed on Jan. 9th, 1961, nearly three years prior to the JFK assassination. Clearly these three individuals had known each other for some time before the assassination and shared mutual interests. These people were not “casually” acquainted. This is interesting in itself, but it gets better. When the new anti-Castro group was created by Bannister and the others, they considered merging members of the DRE group into the new FDC group, then rejected the idea. The FDC decided to keep the groups separate but have the DRE as an affiliate group. Remember that DRE group is where Carlos Bringuier moved to from the CDRF (Sergio’s group). (See below)

The various anti-Castro groups in the USA have been examined at length by a number of researchers and have documented the connections between them and affiliations with both the CIA and FBI. (The following links are provided for a more in depth review if desired)

• https://www.maryferrell.org/php/cryptdb.php?id=AMBUD
• https://www.maryferrell.org/php/cryptdb.php
• https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=26341&relPageId=48

Sergio and Ferrie had been very familiar with each other prior to Sergio moving his group to the 544 Camp Street address, as far back as April, 1961, long before the assassination of President Kennedy.

• June of 1961: David Ferrie assists Sergio Aracha Smith obtain a personal loan.
•  July of 1961, David Ferrie was a pilot for Eastern Airlines. Sergio’s CDRF group sent a letter to Captain Eddie Rickenbacker at Eastern Airlines, requesting the aid of David Ferrie. The letter from the CDRF describes the CDRF organization as the “Provisional Cuban Government”. The CDRF letter also claims the FRD group was created “under the demands of the U.S. government”.
• David Ferrie spent a good deal of time working with Sergio, most at Sergio’s office locations, he was in and out of these offices regularly. This includes the 544 Camp Street address where both Bannister and Sergio had offices on the same floor. (See next five images).

The CDRF letter also alludes to connections between Sergio’s group and Bannister’s new FRD group. This would make sense, as they were moved to the same building, and aspired to the same goals.

There were several anti-Castro groups in the 60’s and an immense amount of information written about them, which can be confusing. For the purpose of the articles on Death Deception, only the following groups are relevant.

• The CRDF group (Sergio’s group originally located in the Baltar Building).
• The FDC group (Bannister’s group, located first at the 544 Camp St. address).
• The DRE group (Bringuier’s group, the New Orleans and Miami divisions).
• The CRC group (which would absorb Bannister’s FRD group).
• The International Trade Mart group (Where Sergio and Bannister would move to).

In Bannister’s FDC group, there are numerous bits of evidence that indicate his group was indeed connected to both the FBI and CIA. Some of this info needs to be corrected, and the rest understood. Documents also show Sergio’s involvement with Bannister’s group. (See next five images)

According to the previous images, Betty Parrott indicates that Logan Lansing was a CIA agent, when in fact he was an FBI agent, as was Regis Kennedy. Logan Lansing’s name and identity as an FBI agent are found on several Warren Commission documents. So, whether or not Logan Lansing falsely presented himself as a CIA agent to these groups or not, I don’t currently know. Betty Parrot also stated that “all members of the group were screened by the FBI and the CIA”. One thing that should be noted is that Regis Kennedy of the FBI was involved and familiar with these individuals as far back as 1961.

Some of you may think that Oswald was handing out his flyers haphazardly, meaning wherever was convenient, but that isn’t true. The members of the 544 Camp Street crew would be found at different locations at different times, moving from the Baltar Building, Canal Street, 544 Camp Street and eventually the International Trade Mart. Where ever the 544 Camp Street crew went, Oswald went. This would make sense, after all. . . when Bill Dalzell was giving Oswald a hard time, Bannister reportedly said to Dalzell “Cool it, he is with us” meaning Oswald. That said, remember the information posted previously that “all members of the group were screened by the FBI and CIA”. If Oswald was a member of their group as Bannister suggested, the screening would have included Oswald, right?

In July of 1963, David Ferrie attended grievance hearings (in Florida) filed against him for crimes against nature (with minor males), specifically “Al Landry and Al Cheramie”.  Cheramie is a name that should be familiar to most of you, in the form of “Rose Cheramie” (aka Melba Marcades), alleged former employee of Jack Ruby.  The people who came to David Ferries defense for his grievance hearing were Guy Bannister and George Wray Gill (Marcello attorney) and Sergio Aracha Smith. (See below)

 

The previous document shows clear evidence of connections between David Ferrie, Sergio Aracha Smith, George Wray Gill and Guy Bannister. Had David Ferrie been charged with these crimes today instead of 1963, he would have been charged and likely convicted as a “sex offender” and a “pedophile”.

In 1963, Ferrie, Bannister and Jack Martin would all be doing work for George Wray Gill, who was attorney for New Orleans mob boss Carlos Marcello.

These individuals all shared similar interests and goals, often times working together. These were all people perfectly willing to either murder, or contribute to the murder of others for profit or personal gain. All of the individuals were rabidly anti-Castro, with one exception,  Lee Harvey Oswald. Oswald was the odd man out, the square peg trying to fit into a round hole. Looking at the backgrounds of the people from the 544 Camp street gang makes Oswald look like a choir boy by comparison. Even so, authorities tried to paint Oswald in the worst possible way they could. Have a look at a bit of personal history of these individuals. (See below)

• Guy Bannister

While Bannister was most definitely rabidly anti-Communist, racist, and apparently he was also involved in the FDC group to get a large piece of the pie, should Castro be overthrown. Bannister also had difficulty in controlling his explosive temper. Bannister almost certainly would have at least known Shaw to some extent, since Shaw was managing director of the International Trade Mart where Bannister would eventually move his anti-Castro group to. (See links and image below)

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Banister
• http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKbannister.htm

• Sergio Aracha Smith

After some time, it was the opinion of anti-Castro Cubans that Sergio Aracha Smith was involved with anti-Castro groups purely for himself, and that he was in it only for the money. Sergio would be expelled from the group for “misappropriation of funds”. The same groups also felt Sergio had betrayed them. These were the reasons Sergio gave for refusing extradition from Texas to New Orleans during the Clay Shaw trial (Sergio had moved to Texas in Oct., 1962). Sergio alleged he was afraid of what members of the groups might do to him should he return to New Orleans. According to the FBI, Sergio was also associated with Carlos Marcello (organized crime). Sergio also introduced David Ferrie to Carlos Bringuier in 1961. Garrison intended to charge Sergio with theft of weapons from Houma, Louisiana also. Sergio did submit to a lie detector test later on, where he admits he knew and met with Clay Shaw. (See link and image below)

• http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKarcacha.htm
• http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2009/05/houma-bunker-raid-revisted.html

• David Ferrie

Ferrie was very anti-communist. When Ferrie was let go in August of 1963 by Eastern Airlines, he went to work directly for George Wray Gill, attorney for Carlos Marcello. Marcello had considerable interest in Cuba as did a number of other top Mob members, since they lost millions in gambling concessions when Castro took over Cuba. Ferrie had a conflict with Jack S. Martin, where Ferrie alleged he had thrown Martin out of Gill’s office. Ferrie didn’t like Martin, and Martin didn’t like Ferrie. Testimony also states that Ferrie was being paid $1,000.00 to $1,500.00 per trip to Cuba (in late 1960, early 1961) while working with Eladio Del Valle. Ferrie was said to have an abundance of $100.00 dollar bills, even after being let go by Eastern Airlines. Ferrie worked for G. Wray Gill and with Carlos Marcello after being fired by Eastern Airlines. Ferrie also had a long history of inappropriate behavior involvement with underage males including sex, hypnotism and drugs…as if he stepped straight out of MK-Ultra. Prior to working for Eastern Airlines, Ferrie had a longing to be a Catholic priest. In July 1961, Ferrie was giving a speech at the Military Order of World Wars, where he was made to stop, mid-speech. Ferrie was stopped because he was viewed as being overly critical of John F. Kennedy, he was not allowed to finish his speech. David Ferrie was thought to be the pilot who flew Carlos Marcello back into the United States after Robert F. Kennedy had Marcello deported to Guatemala. David Ferrie, per testimony, also knew Clay Shaw very well. I suspect that Ferrie’s and Shaw’s mutual interests didn’t involve the assassination of JFK but more likely their mutual sexual interests. Finally, one of the more important items is information related to Ferrie was his becoming a  “Bishop”. (See link and images below)

• (428, 429 & 430): http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol10/html/HSCA_Vol10_0057b.htm
• (404 & 405): http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol10/html/HSCA_Vol10_0056a.htm
• (441): http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol10/html/HSCA_Vol10_0058a.htm

(David Ferrie shown above)

• Jack S. Martin (real name, Earl Scruggs)

Martin was a reported alcoholic, and had prior charges against him for murder, although he wasn’t imprisoned. Martin was rabidly anti-“Bobby Kennedy”.  Jack Martin and Ferrie had been working together on an investigation concerning a phony religious order. Jack Martin also referred to himself as “Bishop”. (See link below)

• (432): http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol10/html/HSCA_Vol10_0057b.htm
• (Pages 2, 4, 5, 6 & 7): http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/29719/rec/3

Over the years, Jack S. Martin is often stated as being a drunk and a person of unscrupulous character. I’ve known quite a few “functioning” alcoholics over the years, who managed to do their jobs or run their businesses very well, in spite of drinking. The belittling of Jack S. Martin was in large part to discredit him as a witness by character assassinations, (something all too commonly done to so many witnesses over the years and even today in JFK FB forums). But let me ask, just exactly what kind of person did anyone expect to be associated with possible killers? Were they expecting St. Peter, Mahatma Ghandi or maybe Donnie Osmond? Wouldn’t it be more logical that a person associated with possible killers or who support murder for profit might be of a similar questionable character? What really matters is the Jack S. Martin knew and had known these individuals over a long period of time. He knew what their work entailed, their habits, their associates and probably even their hobbies.

 

Special Note*: In 1963, Ferrie, Bannister and Jack Martin would all be doing work for George Wray Gill, who was attorney for New Oleans mob boss Carlos Marcello. Ferrie also worked directly for Carlos Marcello himself. George Wray Gill had his office located at room 1707, in the Pierre Marquette Building, in New Orleans. Jim Braden also had an office on the same floor of this building, a few steps away from G. Wray Gill’s. Braden (aka Eugene Hale Brading, aka Harry Eugene Bradley, aka James Bradley Lee, aka James Lee Cole, had his office at room 1701.

Jim Braden was stopped by Dallas Police and questioned in Dealey plaza immediately after shots were fired on 22 November, 1963. (See images below)

Before going much farther, I need to introduce to you the radical shotgun toting Reverend Raymond Broshears, gay activist and former roommate of David Ferrie, now deceased. (See images below).

  

For now, this completes my little cast of characters. David Ferrie, Sergio Aracha Smith, Guy Bannister and Jack S. Martin all knew each other very, very well. They all knew Oswald, and they knew Clay Shaw. There are dozens more pieces of evidence connecting these individuals; I don’t include them all because it gets a bit tedious viewing them all, my goal isn’t to bore you. I’ve tried to keep the info provided to a minimum and it still is lengthy, but also necessary for what comes later. Right now, I’m going to connect some dots that to my knowledge have never been identified.

If we look at Jack Ruby’s notebooks (found in his apartment and the Carousel Club after his arrest), there are some very interesting notations. Larry Laverne Crafard gave extensive testimony regarding these notebooks during the Warren Commission hearings. Oddly enough, the commission didn’t bother to ask Jack Ruby the same questions.

So, let’s have a look at a few of the pages from Ruby’s notebook, (I should mention, many times Larry Crafard wrote names and numbers in the notebooks when people called for Ruby).

• As I have shown, Jack Martin referred to himself as “Bishop”, (see next image, taken from Ruby’s notebook)

• Then there is Ferrie’s former roommate, the Rev. Raymond Broshears. (See next image)

• Then there is this entry of interest in Ruby’s notebook (See next image).

This name shown in the previous image might more properly be written “Gil, G. Ray”. It is pretty common that people spell George (W)Ray Gill’s name wrong, in fact, they spell it wrong more often than they spell it right.

Howard P. Willens claimed in “History Will Prove Us Right” that the Warren Commission had literally hundreds of leads connecting Ruby and Oswald, and chose to ignore them. Why? The commission members didn’t want America to see those connections. Those reports aren’t included in the Warren Report, or the other volumes produced by the WC. Willful ignorance, a deliberate choice, by the Warren Commission, to ignore this considerable evidence, all while claiming their purpose was “not to prosecute” but to collect the assassination evidence. Was their only purpose in collecting that evidence for the intent to withhold it, destroy it and alter it? It’s what they did.

 

(To Be Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE DALLAS ACTION #105~ March 11, 2017, “Damage Control: The CIA And The Warren Report.”

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW #105 HAS UPLOADED! CLICK HERE TO LISTEN/DOWNLOAD FREE: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/105-march-11-2017-damage-control-the-cia

   IN THIS EPISODE~ In 2014, the CIA declassified~with redactions, of course~ a formerly Top Secret Internal History of the John McCone tenure as Director Of Central Intelligence. And contained within this report are true Keen Insights into the dynamics of the relationship between McCone’s Agency and the Warren Commission during the whitewa–errrr, I mean “investigation” of Kennedy’s murder. We’re going to break down and analyze the Agency’s version of events 54 years ago,  and try and shed some light on the feud that erupted between Hoover & the FBI and McCone & the Agency over Mexico City Operations.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION.

The Pristine Bullet

The Pristine Bullet

(Update and Amendment to Death Deception, The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald)

By S.r. “Dusty” Rohde

©March, 2017

In previous articles I published under the title “Death Deception, The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald”, I demonstrated the impossibility of the “Pristine” bullet and the fact that this bullet could not have and did not touch President John F. Kennedy.

At the time of writing the previous articles, I had been aware of certain events but did not mention them. So, now, in light of recently discovered information, I can expose the necessity of this pristine bullet.

First of all, one of the purposes of the pristine bullet was window dressing. By that I mean, this bullet, being in near perfect condition was readily identifiable as a 6.5mm round. The same type of round used in the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle allegedly owned by Oswald. So this round was alleged to be from Oswald’s rifle in testimonies, prior to testing.

I need to remind everyone that based upon the evidence, the pristine bullet was not even a possibility based upon current evidence. Not only did this bullet never touch JFK, it never passed through John Connally either.

Also in previous articles I noted the fraud and perjury committed by J.J. Humes, chief autopsy surgeon at Bethesda. One of Humes many claims were that they were unable to find the bullet that had entered JFK’s back. Without this bullet, there could be no Neutron Activation test on this bullet; A test that would confirm whether or not the bullets hitting JFK and John Connally were in fact similar bullets (same chemical makeup, manufacturers, etc.) or entirely different. Neutron activation tests basically allow forensic experts to determine the mineral make up of various materials with great precision. This is done by the use of radiation on the material (in this case, a bullet) and the resulting Gamma rays are measured. By this method, it is easily determined if bullet’s are from the same weapon. (See link below)

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00450616809410284?journalCode=tajf20

While Humes and other surgeons allegedly couldn’t find the bullet that entered JFK’s back, they are saved. By the mercy of the heavens and the miraculous FBI agents, they discover the pristine bullet in the greatest hour of need! Now, J.J. Humes has the sudden discovery of the frontal neck wound and that this “magic” bullet must have struck both JFK and John Connally. By a sheer stroke of luck, they now have a bullet that they can do the Neutron Activation test with! The test will be between the fragments from John Connally’s wrist and the pristine bullet of the Single bullet theory. (See below)

(Above quote referring to the Connally fragments and pristine bullet)

The suggestion has often been made that this pristine bullet was planted, possibly by Jack Ruby himself. Most people know that this bullet was allegedly found on a stretcher by Parkland Hospital staff. Yet, there was no chain of evidence related to this bullet and considerable evidence that this bullet was not the same bullet found on the stretcher to begin with. So to understand that evidence, please read the material found at the following link. This is an excellent piece of work by Gary Aquilar and Josiah Thompson. (See below)

https://www.history-matters.com/essays/frameup/EvenMoreMagical/EvenMoreMagical.htm

According to the interview given by Tom Alyea, (former reporter who filmed the discovery of the MC rifle on the sixth floor), Tom stated “A round was still in the gun’s chamber, ready to fire, with two more bullets in the ammunition clip”.     (See link below)

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/jfk-assassination-cameraman-followed-police-as-they-searched-for-sniper/article_9679af95-d45f-502b-b094-2a09bc29c16f.html

The fact that there was a live round found in the chamber of the rifle described by Tom Alyea agrees with evidence stated by the DPD. (See image below)

This then would mean there were a total of six rounds found (three live rounds and three empty shell casings), which is precisely how many rounds the clip for the MC rifle holds at one time. Normally, I think most people might be under the impression that only one live round was discovered, and three empty shells. This is because of the evidence that the DPD says they had. Note that in the article by Tom Alyea, he alludes to the “lies” told by DPD officers in their testimonies. Although I know there is a photo floating around that also shows a live round in the clip (still have to track it down). There is however no mention of these two additional live rounds in testimonies, at least not that I’m yet aware of.

The question that needs to be asked is, if the pristine bullet wasn’t fired at JFK or John Connally, where did it come from? Tom Alyea stated two live rounds were in the clip, and now those two rounds are unaccounted for.

Let me ask you a question. If you substitute one of the bullets from the live rounds that were in the clip, for the bullet found on the stretcher (if there ever was a bullet on the stretcher), what happens? Do you suddenly have a bullet that defies all known physics, striking JFK and Connally? Do you now have a bullet that the Neutron Activation test can be done on? Will not that NA test prove beyond doubt that the pristine bullet is a match from the MC rifle, since after all it was taken from the clip in the rifle? Will not that evidence cement the Single Bullet Theory? Why do the NA test between the bullet that hit John Connally and this pristine bullet? Why not do the NA test against the bullet fragments that hit JFK and fragments from Connally? What are they afraid of?

I have demonstrated in previous articles that one and only one bullet hit a target from the TSBD, the bullet that hit John Connally. Do you see what is going on here? There never was any test done between the bullets that hit JFK and the bullets that hit Connally, this was all smoke and mirrors! All of this was just an elaborate deception in the grand scheme of framing Lee Harvey Oswald. The pristine bullet was allegedly “found” even before the autopsy was completed. This substitute bullet virtually quaranteed a match between it and the bullet that hit Conally in the NA test! This planted bullet so crucial to linking the MC rifle to Oswald as the lone assassin was nothign more then a cover-up and frame-up, hand in hand.

THE DALLAS ACTION #104~ February 25, 2017: “Critical Thought & Analysis: Vetting Witnesses”, With Larry Hancock.

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW #104 HAS UPLOADED. CLICK THIS LINK TO LISTEN/DOWNLOAD FREE: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/104-february-25-2017-critical-thought-an

   IN THIS EPISODE~ Author, Researcher and Political Assassinations Scholar Larry Hancock is BACK on the show! He shares with us his 2017 “November In Dallas” LANCER Powerepoint presentation for use in our own private study-group “analysis workshop”. Mr. Larry has worked up a system for, as he calls it, “separating the wheat from the chaff”, specific points/questions/criteria that, when applied to witness statements & stories, can help you better determine which witnesses are worthy of further consideration and which ones are probably a waste of time and not worth further consideration.

   So, we’re going to apply these criteria to several witnesses/characters in the narrative, including Fred Crisman, E. Howard Hunt, Thomas Beckham, Loran Hall, Gene Wheaton, Gerry Hemming and others. We’ll also apply the criteria to ME, and my personal experience as an accidental witness to a murder 13 years ago.

  THIS is a fun, informative and most of all INSTRUCTIONAL conversation. JOIN IN!

THE DALLAS ACTION #103~ February 11, 2017 “Guarding The Gates: Harold Weisberg And The Gunboat Cowboys.”

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW EPISODE #103 IS UP! CLICKTHIS LINK TO PLAY/DOWNLOAD: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/103-february-11-2017-guarding-the-gates-

   IN THIS EPISODE~ One need only study the JFK Assassination for a short amount of time to learn the name Harold Weisberg. It can be argued that Weisberg was~along with Mark Lane~ one of the original Warren Report Critics, publishing the 1st of his 5-volume book series on the Assassination, “Whitewash”, in 1965. Weisberg spent decades investigating Dallas and later donated to Hood College the largest private collection of JFK Assassination research materials in the world, the Legendary Weisberg Archive.

   …and it is from that archive that this story comes. Buried deep in the collection of Weisberg’s own personal corrospondence is the fascinating story of Weisberg’s relationship to anti-Castro mercenary, narcotics & gun-runner and Dealey Plaza Hit Team Suspect Loran E. Hall. A decade-plus-long relationship that saw Weisberg actively & willingly running interference on Hall’s behalf, from Garrison to the HSCA, and we find a  SHOCKING confession~by Weisberg’s Own Hand~ of the commission of a Criminal Act. A criminal act surrounding evidence in the Assassination itself.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION.

Death Deception (The Framing Lee Harvey Oswald), Part VIII.

Death Deception, (The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald), Part VIII.

By S.r. “Dusty” Rohde

© February 2017

Author’s Note: (I wanted to put all of my remaining info into a single article, but as it turns out, there is just to much to share, and on different subjects. This article is necessary for what comes after, thanks…Dusty).

PART VIII:

Before I get into this part of Death Deception, I want to point out a simple fact. By legal definition, Lee Harvey Oswald is “innocent” until “proven guilty” by a court of law. This was true in 1963 and it is just as true today. The Warren Commission is not a lawful substitute for a court of law or LHO’s legal right to trial by jury. Anyone who claims Oswald is guilty of shooting President Kennedy or DPD officer J.D. Tippit is participating in “libel, slander and defamation of character”. All of these are violating Oswald’s constitutional, civil and moral rights. All of these are legally actionable offences. Recently, in a discussion in Facebook forums an individual stated that they were unaware of any fraudulent evidence, perjured testimony, etc related to these shootings. I suggested that person take the time to actually look at the evidence and read the testimonies. This individual stated they would “decline” as they weren’t interested in “biased” information. Exposing evidence, factual, fraudulent, perjured or legitimate is not bias, that is objectivity and a public service. Simply because factual evidence doesn’t fit anyone’s personal pet theory and hence is rejected, that is bias, prejudice and dishonest.

Frankly, if the evidence proved Oswald guilty, I’m perfectly fine with that. I mean, what would I care? Oswald isn’t my father, my son or brother, he is not related to me and I never met the man. So what difference would it make to me if he was in fact guilty? It wouldn’t. On the other hand, if Oswald didn’t kill JFK, then I have a very big problem with the whole outcome of the Warren Commission. If Oswald truly isn’t guilty, it means someone else was and to date, they got away with murder. If they get away with it once, who’s to say they won’t do it again, or haven’t already?

While many have tarred and feathered Oswald for 50 plus years, his guilt had never been proven (beyond reasonable doubt) in a court of law. Hell, no one has even managed to supply a motive for Oswald in over 50 years. Lyndon B. Johnson had motive, so did J. Edgar Hoover and General Edwin Walker, . . .Organized Crime members had it (Carlos Marcello, etc.), Jack Ruby had it, Fidel Castro and numerous Cubans had it, H.L. Hunt and associates had it, even the CIA had motive, just about everyone but Oswald had motive. Some “Lone Nut” fans love to state “the DPD had enough evidence in 24 hours to convict Oswald”. Even after years and years, Chief Curry of the DPD stated they didn’t have to evidence to convict Oswald. Why not?

There are three common denominators used by courts of law to determine or prove someone guilty of a crime, they are “Motive, Means and Opportunity”. As I just noted, no one could prove Oswald had any “motive” to kill JFK. The opposite was actually true, Oswald had stated he liked the Kennedy’s and he thought JFK was doing a good job. Marina Oswald stated that Lee adored JFK.

No agency was able to prove that Oswald had the “opportunity” to kill JFK. Meaning, they couldn’t place him on the sixth floor at the time of the assassination. I hear people say “Oswald was in the TSBD”! Yeah, so were about 90 other people. People might as well just say “Oswald was in Texas”, that would have about the same significance. The same people state “Oswald’s fingerprints were on the boxes of the sixth floor”. No kidding? Imagine that, Oswald has to fill his orders by taking books out of the boxes on various floors, and I’m supposed to be impressed that someone may find his fingerprints on any given box? I’d be amazed if they didn’t find his prints all over. Who is it that said the hardest part of their job was moving the boxes out of their way and then put them back in place? That would be the members of the sixth floor crew, of which Oswald was not part of. The sixth floor crew had to move all of the boxes and put them back while working on the floors of the TSBD. Wouldn’t the sixth floor crew have noticed if Oswald was casually stacking boxes to set up the sniper’s nest while they were working? They didn’t. In fact, according to Tom Aylea’s testimony members of the DPD are the ones who  added boxes to the snipers nest prior to Alyea’s taking any film and photo’s, not Oswald. (See below)

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/local/jfk-assassination-cameraman-followed-police-as-they-searched-for-sniper/article_9679af95-d45f-502b-b094-2a09bc29c16f.html

Also per Aleya’s testimony, Captain Will Fritz picked up the shell casings near the snipers nest, pocketed them, and later officer Studebaker put them back, all prior to being photographed or filmed. In doing so, they contaminated the crime scene. The chain of evidence pertaining to the shell casings would also be broken by Lt. Day after the fact. Lt. Day testified he placed the three shell casings in an envelope (which he didn’t seal) and gave them to Detective Sims. The envelope was later returned (by whom is unknown) with only two of the shell casings, according to Lt. Day. (See the following two images below)

Now this may seem a technicality, but in a court of law, maintaining the chain of evidence is a critical point. Clearly, the chain of evidence in the case of the rifle shells was broken and the evidence contaminated when the shells were picked up prior to being photographed. This is where things take a rather odd turn at a critical juncture. So, let me contest one of the more common claims pertaining to Lee Harvey Oswald.

1)         Oswald’s fingerprints were on the rifle.

Fact #1: Lt. Day of the DPD dusted the MC rifle for fingerprints in front of multiple DPD officers, Sheriff’s officers and reporters from the media which included filming Lt. Day checking the rifle for fingerprints. Lt. Day placed protective cellophane over the fingerprints he found on the rifle, (the alleged “partial palm print” of Oswald was not one of these). Lt. Day was ordered to turn over all evidence related to the rifle and shells to the FBI lab.

Fact #2: The rifle was sent to the FBI lab, and again checked for prints, the FBI also failed to find any fingerprints of value, meaning Oswald’s or anyone else’s. The FBI also found no evidence of the alleged “partial palm print” of Oswald claimed by Lt. Day. The FBI immediately questioned why Lt. Day placed no protective cellophane over the alleged partial palm print (if it existed); as Lt. Day stated the palm print was still visible after he allegedly “lifted” the print and the best bet for the FBI to make a lift of the print to ID Oswald. This caused the FBI and the HSCA to be suspicious of Lt. Days claims. (See below)

Fact #3: The rifle was returned to the DPD by the FBI. Only after the rifle was returned did Lt. Day send two DPD officers to the morgue to fingerprint Oswald, using two different fingerprinting methods. Lt. Day magically and suddenly discovers the “faint” partial print alleged to be Oswald’s, only “after” the DPD officers lifted Oswald’s prints at the morgue (the partial print previously unprotected and unreported to the FBI and unseen by them). Could this partial print of Oswald have come directly from those made at the morgue? Would this have to be proven in a court of law (it would if I was the defense attorney)? Why would Lt. Day send officers to fingerprint Oswald at the morgue, when they had already fingerprinted him (three times) when he was still alive? Why use two differing methods to fingerprint Oswald at the morgue? (Make note that in the previous image, Lt. Day states he was going to attempt to “photograph” the alleged partial palm print he found).

There is a more important and fairly rare bit of evidence that makes the magical appearance of the alleged partial print of Oswald’s even more interesting. When the HSCA requested the “original” partial print from NARA, the Warren Commission, the FBI and the Dallas Police Department, none of these agencies could produce it, it magically disappeared, as if it never existed. (See below)

The only evidence anyone had that the print existed was Lt. Days claim and a “photograph” he submitted as evidence which as stated, was sent on the 26th of November. However, make note the date on the previous image. The memorandum was sent on the 29th, indicating the FBI still had not received the original prints or any others from the time of Oswald’s arrest. (See also the following link, pages 2,3,4,5 and 6)

http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/1344/rec/42

Also make note of the following testimonies related from the FBI and the HSCA during the HSCA hearings.

   

(NARS = NARA where shown in above image)

So if you put this all together, what does it mean?

 

• Day put no protective cellophane over the alleged partial print of Oswald prior to sending the rifle and related material to the FBI. (Even though Lt. Day claimed this partial print had the most value or potential to ID Oswald)
• Day made no mention of the alleged partial print to the FBI when he turned the evidence over to the FBI.
• The FBI found zero evidence of the alleged partial print that Lt. Day claimed still existed after he lifted the print.
• Day never sent the original partial print to the FBI as he claimed.
• During the HSCA hearings, no one could produce the original alleged partial print of Oswald, not the HSCA, the Warren Commission, NARA, the FBI or the Dallas Police.
• No other prints were determined to be of any value in identifying anyone who may have handled the rifle.
• Day only claimed to find the partial print “after” having Oswald fingerprinted twice at the morgue.
• The FBI and the HSCA were suspicious of Lt. Days claim, (meaning suspecting he may have fabricated this evidence).
• Oswald’s prints were not on the rifle.
• With no fingerprints connecting Oswald to the rifle means no one can prove Oswald had the “means” to commit the crime.Even if the original partial print was somehow magically found, after everyone else failed to find it, Prosecutors would still have to prove Lt. Day didn’t fabricate the evidence. They would have to convince a jury, not a court of public opinion. What I’ve shown doesn’t include any of the other evidence already presented in these articles. This also doesn’t include any information or evidence that Oswald may have presented to his defense attorneys had he lived to testify. Add to this information any and all other evidence that is provable as being fraudulent, incorrect, manipulated….or that was suppressed or that vanished from the records. The prosecution has to prove guilt “beyond reasonable doubt”. The defense attorney’s job is to create that reasonable doubt, if they couldn’t prove Oswald innocent outright (and I’m not saying they wouldn’t have been able to prove Oswald innocent).The big question anyone should ask themselves is, did the DPD have any motive in wanting to see Oswald found guilty. Did anyone in the DPD have motive to fabricate evidence? Well, considering one of their own was murdered and Oswald was considered the prime suspect, I would have to say yes. Then include the fact that Oswald allegedly attacked Officer McDonald. I think certain members of the DPD might just have taken that a bit personally.

  While on the subject of proving if Oswald had the “means” to shoot JFK, we need to examine another bit of information researchers and investigators overlook.  The 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano rifle allegedly purchased by Alek Hiddell (aka Lee Harvey Oswald) was indeed found on the sixth floor of the TSBD. This purchase in March 1963 (8 months prior to the assassination) was the alleged proof that Oswald was the assassin (along with the alleged partial print no one can find). Bear in mind that the burden of proof falls upon the prosecution, and not the defendant. So let me bring up a point of interest. (See below)

  

  Whether this story was true or not, I can’t say. Whether or not the WC investigated this story I don’t know. True or not, this story does raise a key point. Even potentially proving with 100 % certainty that Oswald purchased the MC rifle in March doesn’t prove Oswald still owned that rifle on the 22^nd of November. Proving this would be kind of important, don’t you think?

  According to the previous testimony, the rifle wasn’t won by Oswald while gambling (In August), prior to the assassination. Is this why police found no spare ammunition in Oswald’s possession? Can anyone prove to me that there was a single witness who saw the rifle in the home of Ruth Paine on the 21^st of November, or the 20^th, the 19^th, no? How about a week or a month before? Can anyone prove to me the exact date the last time the rifle was actually seen in the garage of the Paine home? Marina Oswald stated the last time she had seen the rifle was two to three weeks prior to the assassination. Marina also said she didn’t see the whole rifle, just part of the barrel. Why does this matter? Any defense attorney worth a damn would ask the same question in a court of law and because the prosecution would have to prove Oswald still owned the rifle.

  If prosecutors fail to prove Oswald had the “motive, means” (owning the rifle on 21^st or 22^nd November and no prints of LHO on the rifle) or opportunity to kill JFK means no one can convict him.  I’ll grant that what I’ve presented hear could be declared as “technicalities” that could prove Oswald innocent, even if he had fired a shot. Just the same, it is important that you understand the information that has been presented to you in this article. This information is laying the foundation for some very surprising information coming in the next article. On that note, let me provide a sample of what is coming in that next article.

  The big question is can Oswald be proven innocent beyond these technicalities?

  Let’s have a look at the next bit of interesting evidence.  Anyone familiar with the history of the assassination is aware that several witnesses testified there was a Secret Service agent (fake) on the grassy knoll who was blocking people from going behind the picket fence. This is something that is never looked at with any depth on JFK research forums.

   

  • If “Oswald acted alone”, then explain the fake Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll.

   

  What you may not know, is that Oswald was reported as having met with an FBI agent using Secret Service credentials while at work, and prior to the assassination. (See below).

  “Alba always ate his lunch at Jack MANCUSO ‘ s restaurant and he saw OSWALD there many times but usually alone as he can’t remember anyone with him. (NOTE: Guy BANISTER office was just behind the restaurant in the same building). During this period of time the Secret Service stored their cars, as well as vehicles that were seized by them at ALBA’s garage.

  One particular day, he remembers it because it was rather unusual and his memory was jogged by a TV commercial being shown just a couple of years ago, a FBI man came down, showed ALBA his credentials and also showed him a pass issued by the Secret Service allowing this FBI man to take out what he recalls as light green Plymouth. The car was kept out, apparently by this agent for two or three days. During this time he (Alba) was standing outside of his garage and he saw, as he referred to it, ‘my car’ coming down the street. He saw the plate number so it was the same one. The car stopped at the corner just outside of the Reilly Coffee company and he saw OSWALD come out of the building, go over to the car, not hold a conversation of any duration, but take a legal sized envelope hold it to his stomach under his T-shirt, turn around in a crouched position, and go back into the building straightening up as he went. The thing that jogged his memory was the commercial of a businessman (Rosenberg) showing a similar action. HE STATES THAT HE HAS NOT MENTIONED THIS IN THE PAST. ALBA has the record books going back to that time and an attempt was made to ascertain the license plate number and the agent assigned to the vehicle. The records that were checked by Daly and Buras only showed three of the five or six that were stored there and none were the vehicle in question. Further efforts will be made in this direction.” (See link below).

  http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/32045/rec/5

This is a rather strange set of circumstances is it not, a fake Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll, and an FBI agent using Secret Service credentials meeting with Oswald? This may or may not have been the same Secret Service agent on the grassy knoll on the day of the assassination, but it could be a vital bit of information. Obviously, if this was the same
“fake” Secret Service agent, then Lee was obviously not “acting alone”.

Author’s Note: (In the next article it is time to identify those involved with the assassination and to provide evidence well beyone that…until next time).

 

 

 

 

THE DALLAS ACTION #102 ~ January 21, 2017: “BLOWBACK~Part Three: AM/TRUNK And The Secret Team”, with Ted Rubinstein.

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW #102 IS UP! https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/102-january-21-2017-blowback-part-three-

IN THIS EPISODE~we’re BACK with our friend Ted Rubinstein, who is going to lay out for the individuals and connections of the super-secret network of shadowy intelligence operatives that thrived for decades. Connections that not only reach back to Kennedy-sanctioned-and-led anti-Castro operations, but reach forward to illegal narcotics & gun trafficking in the Middle East and other political assassinations committed on US soil, and may very well have bearing on the truth of the JFK Hit.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION.

THE DALLAS ACTION #101~ “BLOWBACK~Part Two: Cubans, Contras, Dope & Money.”

ATTENTION ALL HANDS! ALL-NEW PT.101 IS UP NOW! CLICK HERE TO LISTEN/DOWNLOAD: https://www.spreaker.com/user/7338953/101-january-7-2017-blowback-part-two-cub

   IN THIS EPISODE~ in Part Two of the “BLOWBACK” series(Ted Rubinstein will be back in two weeks for Part Three),  we move forward in time to 1985 to relate some very useful background info tht will help us put all this stuff into a proper context: The story of a retired career Military Intelligence who came forward with an astounding array of allegations. And his information not only led to the expusure of the Iran/Contra Network, but threatened to expose an alleged secret, shadow network of retired Intelligence Officers up to no good, and as he claimed, were involved in the Dallas action.

   JOIN THE CONVERSATION.